Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Geely Emgrand X7 vs JAC S5: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Geely Emgrand X7

Geely · 2015

Emgrand X7

Power
110 kW150 PS

Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
JAC S5

JAC · 2013–2019

S5

Power
100 kW136 PS

Photo: order_242 from Chile / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Emgrand X7 2 S5 0

  • Family Emgrand X7 Boot: 580 l vs 500 l
  • Off-road Emgrand X7 Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV

In plain words

Geely Emgrand X7 has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 100 kW (136 PS) for JAC S5. Geely Emgrand X7 has the bigger boot: 580 l against 500 l. JAC S5 is the older design (from 2013); Geely Emgrand X7 arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Geely Emgrand X7 is the pick for family and off-road.

Size and weight

Emgrand X7S5
Boot 580 l20.5 cu ft 500 l17.7 cu ft −80 l −2.8 cu ft −13.8%

Difference vs Emgrand X7 (±).

Full specifications

Geely Emgrand X7JAC S5
General
Version 2.4 · 110 kW (150 PS) 2.0 · petrol · 100 kW (136 PS)
Production years 2015 2013–2019
Body SUV SUV
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country China China
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp Better 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp
Power, all versions 92–110 kW (125–150 PS) 123–148 hp 100–129 kW (136–175 PS) 134–173 hp
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 2,400 cc 2.4 l 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l
Drive All-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length No data 4,430 mm 174.4 in
Height No data 1,660 mm 65.4 in
Wheelbase No data 2,645 mm 104.1 in
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 580 l 20.5 cu ft Better 500 l 17.7 cu ft

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Photo credits