Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR vs Lamborghini Urus: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Land Rover · 2015–2022
Range Rover Sport SVR
- Power
- 405 kW551 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 4.7 s
- Top speed
- 261 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 2,335 kg
Lamborghini · 2018–present
Urus
- Power
- 478 kW650 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 3.6 s
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- 2,200 kg
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Range Rover Sport SVR 1 Urus 1
- City Range Rover Sport SVR Length: 4,872 mm vs 5,113 mm; Width: 1,983 mm vs 2,017 mm
- Performance Urus Power per tonne: 217 kW/t vs 173 kW/t; 0–100 km/h: 3.6 s vs 4.7 s
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs All-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Lamborghini Urus is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 3.6 s against 4.7 s for Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR. Lamborghini Urus is 241 mm longer than Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR (5,113 mm vs 4,872 mm). Lamborghini Urus is lighter by 135 kg (2,200 kg vs 2,335 kg). Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR is the older design (from 2015); Lamborghini Urus arrived in 2018. Lamborghini Urus is still in production; Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR is not. On the catalog figures, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR is the pick for city; the Lamborghini Urus is the pick for performance.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Range Rover Sport SVR | Urus |
|---|---|---|
| PI | A · 622 | A · 706 |
| Power | 67 | 74 |
| Grip | 55 | 66 |
| Handling | 33 | 36 |
| Top speed | 62 | 79 |
| Launch | 67 | 79 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Urus478 kW (650 PS) 11.70 sat 195 km/h
- 2 Range Rover Sport SVR405 kW (551 PS) 13.24 sat 166 km/h · +1.54 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Range Rover Sport SVR | Urus | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,872 mm191.8 in | 5,113 mm201.3 in +241 mm +9.5 in +4.9% |
| Width | 1,983 mm78.1 in | 2,017 mm79.4 in +34 mm +1.3 in +1.7% |
| Height | 1,780 mm70.1 in | 1,638 mm64.5 in −142 mm −5.6 in −8.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,923 mm115.1 in | 3,002 mm118.2 in +79 mm +3.1 in +2.7% |
| Kerb weight | 2,335 kg5,148 lb | 2,200 kg4,850 lb −135 kg −298 lb −5.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too wide | Too long and too wide |
Difference vs Range Rover Sport SVR (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR | Lamborghini Urus | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 405 kW (551 PS) | 478 kW (650 PS) |
| Production years | 2015–2022 | 2018–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | United Kingdom | Italy |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 405 kW (551 PS) 543 hp | 478 kW (650 PS) 641 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 405–423 kW (551–575 PS) 543–567 hp | 478–588 kW (650–799 PS) 641–789 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft Better |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 4.7 s | 3.6 s Better |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 261 km/h 162 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 173 kW/t 211 hp/ton calculated | 217 kW/t 264 hp/ton calculated Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,872 mm 191.8 in | 5,113 mm 201.3 in |
| Width | 1,983 mm 78.1 in | 2,017 mm 79.4 in |
| Height | 1,780 mm 70.1 in | 1,638 mm 64.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923 mm 115.1 in | 3,002 mm 118.2 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 2,335 kg 5,148 lb | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb Better |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 784 l 27.7 cu ft | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).