Chery Tiggo 5 II vs JAC S5: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chery · 2017–2021
Tiggo 5 II
- Power
- 109 kW148 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 13.0 s
Photo: Kevauto / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
JAC · 2013–2019
S5
- Power
- 100 kW136 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Photo: order_242 from Chile / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Tiggo 5 II 1 S5 1
- Family S5 Boot: 500 l vs 420 l
- Off-road Tiggo 5 II Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Chery Tiggo 5 II has more power: 109 kW (148 PS) against 100 kW (136 PS) for JAC S5. JAC S5 has the bigger boot: 500 l against 420 l. JAC S5 is the older design (from 2013); Chery Tiggo 5 II arrived in 2017. On the catalog figures, the JAC S5 is the pick for family; the Chery Tiggo 5 II is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the JAC S5 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Tiggo 5 II | S5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 420 l14.8 cu ft | 500 l17.7 cu ft +80 l +2.8 cu ft +19.0% |
Difference vs Tiggo 5 II (±).
Full specifications
| Chery Tiggo 5 II | JAC S5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 · petrol · 109 kW (148 PS) | 2.0 · petrol · 100 kW (136 PS) |
| Production years | 2017–2021 | 2013–2019 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 109 kW (148 PS) 146 hp Better | 100 kW (136 PS) 134 hp |
| Power, all versions | 109 kW (148 PS) 146 hp | 100–129 kW (136–175 PS) 134–173 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 13.0 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,500 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l | 2,000 cc · 4 cyl 2.0 l |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,430 mm 174.4 in |
| Height | No data | 1,660 mm 65.4 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,645 mm 104.1 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 420 l 14.8 cu ft | 500 l 17.7 cu ft Better |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).