Volkswagen Golf Mk7 vs Volkswagen Caddy SB: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Volkswagen · 2012–2021
Golf Mk7
- Power
- 63 kW86 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.9 s
- Top speed
- 179 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,205 kg
Volkswagen · 2020–present
Caddy SB
- Power
- 55 kW75 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Caddy SB Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Minivan / MPV vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Volkswagen Golf Mk7 has more power: 63 kW (86 PS) against 55 kW (75 PS) for Volkswagen Caddy SB. Volkswagen Golf Mk7 is the older design (from 2012); Volkswagen Caddy SB arrived in 2020. Volkswagen Caddy SB is still in production; Volkswagen Golf Mk7 is not. On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Caddy SB is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Volkswagen Caddy SB yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk7 | Volkswagen Caddy SB | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.2 TSI · petrol · 63 kW (86 PS) | 2.0 TDI 75 · diesel · 55 kW (75 PS) |
| Production years | 2012–2021 | 2020–present |
| Body | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV |
| Class | No data | Van |
| Country | Germany | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 63 kW (86 PS) 84 hp Better | 55 kW (75 PS) 74 hp |
| Power, all versions | 63–228 kW (86–310 PS) 84–306 hp | 55–90 kW (75–122 PS) 74–121 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 160 Nm 118 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 11.9 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 179 km/h 111 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 52 kW/t 64 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Diesel |
| Engine | 1,197 cc 1.2 l | 4 cyl |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,255 mm 167.5 in | No data |
| Width | 1,791 mm 70.5 in | No data |
| Height | 1,435 mm 56.5 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,631 mm 103.6 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 380 l 13.4 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 50 l 13.2 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 4.9 l/100 km 48.0 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 113 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,290/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 1,020 km 634 mi estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2012) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Country, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.