Opel Grandland II vs Jeep Compass III: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Opel · 2024–present
Grandland II
- Power
- 143 kW194 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.8 s
- Top speed
- 220 km/h
- Kerb mass
- -
Jeep · 2025–present
Compass III
- Power
- 107 kW145 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 10.0 s
- Top speed
- 195 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,663 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Grandland II 1 Compass III 1
- City Compass III Length: 4,548 mm vs 4,650 mm
- Performance Grandland II 0–100 km/h: 7.8 s vs 10.0 s
- Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Opel Grandland II is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 7.8 s against 10.0 s for Jeep Compass III. Opel Grandland II is 102 mm longer than Jeep Compass III (4,650 mm vs 4,548 mm). Opel Grandland II is the older design (from 2024); Jeep Compass III arrived in 2025. On the catalog figures, the Jeep Compass III is the pick for city; the Opel Grandland II is the pick for performance. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Opel Grandland II yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Grandland II | Compass III |
|---|---|---|
| PI | C · 498 | C · 433 |
| Power | 41 | 36 |
| Grip | 35 | 30 |
| Handling | 58 | 51 |
| Top speed | 46 | 37 |
| Launch | 44 | 32 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Grandland II1.6 Turbo Plug-in Hybrid 195 · 143 kW (194 PS) 15.78 sat 142 km/h
- 2 Compass III1.2 e-Hybrid · petrol · 107 kW (145 PS) 17.10 sat 128 km/h · +1.32 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Grandland II | Compass III | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,650 mm183.1 in | 4,548 mm179.1 in −102 mm −4.0 in −2.2% |
| Width | 1,905 mm75.0 in | 1,928 mm75.9 in +23 mm +0.9 in +1.2% |
| Height | 1,667 mm65.6 in | 1,654 mm65.1 in −13 mm −0.5 in −0.8% |
| Boot | 550 l19.4 cu ft † | 550 l19.4 cu ft |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too wide | Too wide |
Difference vs Grandland II (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Opel Grandland II | Jeep Compass III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 Turbo Plug-in Hybrid 195 · 143 kW (194 PS) | 1.2 e-Hybrid · petrol · 107 kW (145 PS) |
| Production years | 2024–present | 2025–present |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Germany | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 143 kW (194 PS) 192 hp Better | 107 kW (145 PS) 143 hp |
| Power, all versions | 100–239 kW (136–325 PS) 134–321 hp | 107–276 kW (145–375 PS) 143–370 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft Better | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 7.8 s Better | 10.0 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 220 km/h 137 mph Better | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 64 kW/t 78 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Plug-in hybrid | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,598 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | 3 cyl |
| Engine code | No data | HN09 |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch | 6-speed dual-clutch |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,650 mm 183.1 in | 4,548 mm 179.1 in |
| Width | 1,905 mm 75.0 in | 1,928 mm 75.9 in |
| Height | 1,667 mm 65.6 in | 1,654 mm 65.1 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,795 mm 110.0 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,663 kg 3,666 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 550 l 19.4 cu ft † | 550 l 19.4 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 55 l 14.5 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 5.6 l/100 km 42.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 127 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,470/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 982 km 610 mi estimated |
| Electric | ||
| Battery Why it matters: A bigger battery usually gives more range, but takes longer to charge fully. | 18 kWh | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Drive, Boot.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol. † from another version of this generation.