Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Kia Stonic YB vs Kia XCeed CD: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Kia Stonic YB

Kia · 2017–present

Stonic YB

C PI 454

Power
74 kW101 PS
0–100 km/h
11.0 s
Top speed
179 km/h
Kerb mass
1,205 kg

Version spec sheet

Photo: Alexander Migl / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Kia XCeed CD

Kia · 2019–present

XCeed CD

C PI 453

Power
85 kW116 PS
0–100 km/h
11.7 s
Top speed
182 km/h
Kerb mass
1,355 kg

Version spec sheet

Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Stonic YB 3 XCeed CD 2

  • Family XCeed CD Boot: 426 l vs 352 l
  • City Stonic YB Length: 4,165 mm vs 4,380 mm; Width: 1,760 mm vs 1,826 mm
  • Long trips XCeed CD Wheelbase (ride comfort proxy): 2,650 mm vs 2,580 mm
  • Performance Stonic YB 0–100 km/h: 11.0 s vs 11.7 s
  • Running costs Stonic YB Fuel per year: €1,500 vs €1,680 (estimated)
  • Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Crossover vs Front-wheel drive · Crossover

In plain words

Kia Stonic YB is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 11.0 s against 11.7 s for Kia XCeed CD. Kia XCeed CD is 215 mm longer than Kia Stonic YB (4,380 mm vs 4,165 mm). Kia Stonic YB is lighter by 150 kg (1,205 kg vs 1,355 kg). Kia XCeed CD has the bigger boot: 426 l against 352 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €1,500 (Kia Stonic YB), €1,680 (Kia XCeed CD) (estimated). Kia Stonic YB is the older design (from 2017); Kia XCeed CD arrived in 2019. On the catalog figures, the Kia XCeed CD is the pick for family and long trips; the Kia Stonic YB is the pick for city, performance and running costs.

Race Stats side by side

Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.

Race Stats side by side
StatStonic YBXCeed CD
PIC · 454C · 453
Power 35 36
Grip 40 39
Handling 65 65
Top speed 30 32
Launch 28 25

Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race

Who wins a race?

Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.

  1. 1 Stonic YB1.0 T-GDI 100 · petrol · 74 kW (101 PS) 17.74 sat 124 km/h
  2. 2 XCeed CD1.0 T-GDI · petrol · 85 kW (116 PS) 18.05 sat 121 km/h · +0.31 s

Race them in 1CARS Race →

Size and weight

Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.

Stonic YB · XCeed CD
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ftWheelbase 2,580 mmWheelbase 8 ft 6 inLength 4,165 mmLength 13 ft 8 in1,520 mm5 ft 0 inWheelbase 2,650 mmWheelbase 8 ft 8 inLength 4,380 mmLength 14 ft 4 in1,483 mm4 ft 10 in
Stonic YBXCeed CD
Length 4,165 mm164.0 in 4,380 mm172.4 in +215 mm +8.5 in +5.2%
Width 1,760 mm69.3 in 1,826 mm71.9 in +66 mm +2.6 in +3.8%
Height 1,520 mm59.8 in 1,483 mm58.4 in −37 mm −1.5 in −2.4%
Wheelbase 2,580 mm101.6 in 2,650 mm104.3 in +70 mm +2.8 in +2.7%
Kerb weight 1,205 kg2,657 lb 1,355 kg2,987 lb +150 kg +331 lb +12.4%
Boot 352 l12.4 cu ft 426 l15.0 cu ft +74 l +2.6 cu ft +21.0%
Fuel tank 45 l11.9 gal US 50 l13.2 gal US +5 l +1.3 gal US +11.1%
Fits a standard garage? YesYes

Difference vs Stonic YB (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Size comparison to scale: Front and top views, inches →

Full specifications

Kia Stonic YBKia XCeed CD
General
Version 1.0 T-GDI 100 · petrol · 74 kW (101 PS) 1.0 T-GDI · petrol · 85 kW (116 PS)
Production years 2017–present 2019–present
Body Crossover Crossover
Class SUV / crossover SUV / crossover
Country South Korea South Korea
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 74 kW (101 PS) 99 hp 85 kW (116 PS) 114 hp Better
Power, all versions 74–88 kW (101–120 PS) 99–118 hp 74–150 kW (101–204 PS) 99–201 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. 172 Nm 127 lb-ft 200 Nm 148 lb-ft Better
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 11.0 s Better 11.7 s
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 179 km/h 111 mph 182 km/h 113 mph
Power per tonne 61 kW/t 75 hp/ton calculated 63 kW/t 76 hp/ton calculated
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 3 cyl 998 cc · 3 cyl 1.0 l
Engine code G3LH G3LH
Gearbox 6-speed manual 6-speed manual
Drive Front-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,165 mm 164.0 in 4,380 mm 172.4 in
Width 1,760 mm 69.3 in 1,826 mm 71.9 in
Height 1,520 mm 59.8 in 1,483 mm 58.4 in
Wheelbase 2,580 mm 101.6 in 2,650 mm 104.3 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,205 kg 2,657 lb Better 1,355 kg 2,987 lb
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 352 l 12.4 cu ft 426 l 15.0 cu ft Better
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. 45 l 11.9 gal US 50 l 13.2 gal US Better
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 5.7 l/100 km 41.3 mpg US Better 6.4 l/100 km 36.8 mpg US
CO₂ 128 g/km Better 144 g/km
Fuel cost per year €1,500/year estimated Better €1,680/year estimated
Range on a full tank 789 km 490 mi estimated 781 km 485 mi estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.

Photo credits