Toyota Tundra XK30 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300 J300: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Toyota · 2000–2006
Tundra XK30
- Power
- 183 kW249 PS
Photo: IFCAR / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain
Toyota · 2021–present
Land Cruiser 300 J300
- Power
- 227 kW309 PS
In plain words
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 J300 has more power: 227 kW (309 PS) against 183 kW (249 PS) for Toyota Tundra XK30. Toyota Tundra XK30 is the older design (from 2000); Toyota Land Cruiser 300 J300 arrived in 2021. Toyota Land Cruiser 300 J300 is still in production; Toyota Tundra XK30 is not.
Full specifications
| Toyota Tundra XK30 | Toyota Land Cruiser 300 J300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 4.7 V8 2UZ-FE · petrol · 183 kW (249 PS) | 3.3 V6 twin-turbo diesel (F33A-FTV) · 227 kW (309 PS) |
| Production years | 2000–2006 | 2021–present |
| Body | Pickup | SUV |
| Class | Pickup | SUV / crossover |
| Country | United States | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 183 kW (249 PS) 245 hp | 227 kW (309 PS) 304 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 142–210 kW (193–286 PS) 190–282 hp | 201–341 kW (273–464 PS) 270–457 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Diesel |
| Engine | 8 cyl | 6 cyl |
| Engine code | 2UZ-FE | F33A-FTV |
| Gearbox | automatic | 10-speed automatic |
| Drive | No data | Four-wheel drive (4×4) |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,980 mm 196.1 in |
| Width | No data | 1,980 mm 78.0 in |
| Height | No data | 1,950 mm 76.8 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,850 mm 112.2 in |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 110 l 29.1 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 8.9 l/100 km 26.4 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,200/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 1,236 km 768 mi estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.