Toyota Yaris Cross XP210 vs Toyota Aygo AB70: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Toyota · 2020–present
Yaris Cross XP210
- Power
- 96 kW131 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Toyota · 2022–present
Aygo AB70
- Power
- 53 kW72 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 14.9 s
- Top speed
- 158 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,024 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Aygo AB70 Length: 3,700 mm vs 4,172 mm
In plain words
Toyota Yaris Cross XP210 has more power: 96 kW (131 PS) against 53 kW (72 PS) for Toyota Aygo AB70. Toyota Yaris Cross XP210 is 472 mm longer than Toyota Aygo AB70 (4,172 mm vs 3,700 mm). Toyota Yaris Cross XP210 is the older design (from 2020); Toyota Aygo AB70 arrived in 2022. On the catalog figures, the Toyota Aygo AB70 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Toyota Yaris Cross XP210 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Yaris Cross XP210 | Aygo AB70 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,172 mm164.3 in | 3,700 mm145.7 in −472 mm −18.6 in −11.3% |
| Width | 1,765 mm69.5 in | 1,740 mm68.5 in −25 mm −1.0 in −1.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,560 mm100.8 in | 2,430 mm95.7 in −130 mm −5.1 in −5.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Yaris Cross XP210 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Toyota Yaris Cross XP210 | Toyota Aygo AB70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 Hybrid 130 · 96 kW (131 PS) | 1.0 VVT-i · petrol · 53 kW (72 PS) |
| Production years | 2020–present | 2022–present |
| Body | Crossover | Crossover |
| Class | SUV / crossover | A-segment (city car) |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 96 kW (131 PS) 129 hp Better | 53 kW (72 PS) 71 hp |
| Power, all versions | 85–96 kW (116–131 PS) 114–129 hp | 53–85 kW (72–116 PS) 71–114 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 185 Nm 136 lb-ft Better | 93 Nm 69 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 14.9 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 158 km/h 98 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 52 kW/t 63 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Hybrid | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 998 cc · 3 cyl 1.0 l |
| Engine code | M15A-FXE | 1KR-B52 |
| Gearbox | CVT | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,172 mm 164.3 in | 3,700 mm 145.7 in |
| Width | 1,765 mm 69.5 in | 1,740 mm 68.5 in |
| Height | No data | 1,525 mm 60.0 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,560 mm 100.8 in | 2,430 mm 95.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,024 kg 2,258 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 231 l 8.2 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 36 l 9.5 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 4.8 l/100 km 49.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 109 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,260/year estimated |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★☆ (2025) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Country.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.