Mitsubishi Outlander CW vs Jeep Compass I: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Mitsubishi · 2005–2012
Outlander CW
- Power
- 115 kW156 PS
Jeep · 2006–2016
Compass I
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
Photo: OSX / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Outlander CW Euro NCAP: 4★ vs 2★
In plain words
Mitsubishi Outlander CW has more power: 115 kW (156 PS) against 103 kW (140 PS) for Jeep Compass I. Mitsubishi Outlander CW is the older design (from 2005); Jeep Compass I arrived in 2006. On the catalog figures, the Mitsubishi Outlander CW is the pick for family.
Full specifications
| Mitsubishi Outlander CW | Jeep Compass I | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.2 DI-D (PSA DW12) · diesel · 115 kW (156 PS) | 2.0 CRD · diesel · 103 kW (140 PS) |
| Production years | 2005–2012 | 2006–2016 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | United States |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 115 kW (156 PS) 154 hp Better | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp |
| Power, all versions | 103–130 kW (140–177 PS) 138–174 hp | 103–128 kW (140–174 PS) 138–172 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine | No data | 4 cyl |
| Gearbox | 6-speed dual-clutch | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,765 mm 187.6 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm 105.1 in | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★☆ (2007) Better | ★★☆☆☆ (2012) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).