Ural-Next vs MAZ-6312: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Ural · 2015–present
Ural-Next
- Power
- 229 kW311 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Spielvogel For a gallery of some more of my uploaded pictures see: here. / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
MAZ · 2002
MAZ-6312
- Power
- 266 kW362 PS
- Kerb mass
- 11,600 kg
Photo: U.S. Embassy Kyiv Ukraine / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain
In plain words
MAZ-6312 has more power: 266 kW (362 PS) against 229 kW (311 PS) for Ural-Next. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Ural-Next yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Ural-Next | MAZ-6312 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 6.7 YaMZ-536 · diesel · 229 kW (311 PS) | Bort · 266 kW (362 PS) |
| Production years | 2015–present | 2002 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | No data | Belarus |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 229 kW (311 PS) 307 hp | 266 kW (362 PS) 357 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 177–230 kW (241–313 PS) 237–308 hp | 228–309 kW (310–420 PS) 306–414 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 23 kW/t 28 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine | 6,650 cc 6.7 l | No data |
| Engine code | YaMZ-536 | YaMZ-6511.10 |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 9,000 mm 354.3 in | No data |
| Width | 2,259 mm 88.9 in | No data |
| Height | 2,952 mm 116.2 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 4,755 mm 187.2 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 11,600 kg 25,574 lb |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).