Volvo XC60 II vs Volvo V60 Cross Country II: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Volvo · 2017–present
XC60 II
- Power
- 140 kW190 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 8.8 s
- Top speed
- 205 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,764 kg
Volvo · 2018–present
V60 Cross Country II
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 140–184 kW190–250 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Vauxford / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road XC60 II Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs All-wheel drive · Station wagon
In plain words
Volvo XC60 II is the older design (from 2017); Volvo V60 Cross Country II arrived in 2018. On the catalog figures, the Volvo XC60 II is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Volvo V60 Cross Country II yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Volvo XC60 II | Volvo V60 Cross Country II | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | D4 AWD · diesel · 140 kW (190 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2017–present | 2018–present |
| Body | SUV | Station wagon |
| Class | SUV / crossover | No data |
| Country | Sweden | Sweden |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 140 kW (190 PS) 188 hp | 140–184 kW (190–250 PS) 188–247 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 140–339 kW (190–461 PS) 188–455 hp | 140–184 kW (190–250 PS) 188–247 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 8.8 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 205 km/h 127 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 79 kW/t 97 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | No data |
| Engine | 4 cyl | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,688 mm 184.6 in | No data |
| Width | 1,902 mm 74.9 in | No data |
| Height | 1,658 mm 65.3 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,865 mm 112.8 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,764 kg 3,889 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 483 l 17.1 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 71 l 18.8 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 6.3 l/100 km 37.3 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 164 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,560/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 1,127 km 700 mi estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2017) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Country, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.