Hyundai Solaris vs Skoda Rapid: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Hyundai · 2011–2017
Solaris RB
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- Top speed
- -
Skoda · 1984–1990
Rapid Typ 743 / 747
- Power
- 43 kW58 PS
- Top speed
- 153 km/h
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Rapid Typ 743 / 747 Length: 4,200 mm vs 4,370 mm
In plain words
Hyundai Solaris has more power: 90 kW (122 PS) against 43 kW (58 PS) for Skoda Rapid. Hyundai Solaris is 170 mm longer than Skoda Rapid (4,370 mm vs 4,200 mm). Skoda Rapid is the older design (from 1935); Hyundai Solaris arrived in 2011. On the catalog figures, the Skoda Rapid is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Solaris RB | Rapid Typ 743 / 747 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,370 mm172.0 in | 4,200 mm165.4 in −170 mm −6.7 in −3.9% |
| Height | 1,700 mm66.9 in | 1,380 mm54.3 in −320 mm −12.6 in −18.8% |
| Wheelbase | 2,570 mm101.2 in | 2,400 mm94.5 in −170 mm −6.7 in −6.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Solaris RB (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Hyundai Solaris | Skoda Rapid | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · 90 kW (122 PS) | Rapid Typ 743 / 747 · 130 · 43 kW (58 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–2017 | 1984–1990 |
| Body | Sedan, Hatchback | Coupe |
| Country | South Korea | Czech Republic |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp Better | 43 kW (58 PS) 58 hp |
| Power, all versions | 79–90 kW (107–122 PS) 106–121 hp | 23–92 kW (31–125 PS) 31–123 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | No data | 98 Nm 72 lb-ft |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 153 km/h 95 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | 1,289 cc · 4 cyl 1.3 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed manual |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,370 mm 172.0 in | 4,200 mm 165.4 in |
| Width | No data | 1,610 mm 63.4 in |
| Height | 1,700 mm 66.9 in | 1,380 mm 54.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570 mm 101.2 in | 2,400 mm 94.5 in |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 5.0 l/100 km 47.0 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,310/year estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.