Renault Duster vs Changan CS35: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Renault · 2010
Duster
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
- Top speed
- -

Changan · 2012–2022
CS35
- Power
- 83 kW113 PS
- Top speed
- 180 km/h
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City CS35 Length: 4,200 mm vs 4,315 mm; Width: 1,755 mm vs 1,822 mm
In plain words
Renault Duster has more power: 84 kW (114 PS) against 83 kW (113 PS) for Changan CS35. Renault Duster is 115 mm longer than Changan CS35 (4,315 mm vs 4,200 mm). Renault Duster is the older design (from 2010); Changan CS35 arrived in 2012. Renault Duster is still in production; Changan CS35 is not. On the catalog figures, the Changan CS35 is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Duster | CS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,315 mm169.9 in | 4,200 mm165.4 in −115 mm −4.5 in −2.7% |
| Width | 1,822 mm71.7 in | 1,755 mm69.1 in −67 mm −2.6 in −3.7% |
| Height | 1,625 mm64.0 in | 1,660 mm65.4 in +35 mm +1.4 in +2.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm105.2 in | 2,550 mm100.4 in −123 mm −4.8 in −4.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Duster (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Duster | Changan CS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 16V (114 PS) · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.6 · 83 kW (113 PS) |
| Production years | 2010 | 2012–2022 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp | 83 kW (113 PS) 111 hp |
| Power, all versions | 66–105 kW (90–143 PS) 89–141 hp | 83 kW (113 PS) 111 hp |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 180 km/h 112 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,315 mm 169.9 in | 4,200 mm 165.4 in |
| Width | 1,822 mm 71.7 in | 1,755 mm 69.1 in |
| Height | 1,625 mm 64.0 in | 1,660 mm 65.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,673 mm 105.2 in | 2,550 mm 100.4 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 337 l 11.9 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 6.8 l/100 km 34.6 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,790/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.