Chevrolet Tracker vs Mitsubishi ASX: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chevrolet · 2013–2022
Tracker
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
Mitsubishi · 2010–2024
ASX I
- Power
- 86 kW117 PS
In plain words
Mitsubishi ASX is the older design (from 2010); Chevrolet Tracker arrived in 2013. Mitsubishi ASX is still in production; Chevrolet Tracker is not.
Full specifications
| Chevrolet Tracker | Mitsubishi ASX | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | No data | 1.6 · 86 kW (117 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2022 | 2010–2024 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | United States | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better | 86 kW (117 PS) 115 hp |
| Power, all versions | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp | 86–110 kW (117–150 PS) 115–148 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 1,600 cc 1.6 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 5-speed |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,295 mm 169.1 in |
| Width | No data | 1,770 mm 69.7 in |
| Height | No data | 1,625 mm 64.0 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,670 mm 105.1 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 415 l 14.7 cu ft |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2011) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).