Renault Sandero Stepway vs Lada Largus Cross: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2008–2012
Sandero Stepway I
- Power
- 62 kW84 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Lada · 2015–present
Largus Cross
- Power
- 77 kW105 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 13.5 s
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road Largus Cross Drive and body: All-wheel drive · Station wagon vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Lada Largus Cross has more power: 77 kW (105 PS) against 62 kW (84 PS) for Renault Sandero Stepway. Renault Sandero Stepway is the older design (from 2008); Lada Largus Cross arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Lada Largus Cross is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Renault Sandero Stepway yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Renault Sandero Stepway | Lada Largus Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · petrol · 62 kW (84 PS) | 1.6 · 77 kW (105 PS) |
| Production years | 2008–2012 | 2015–present |
| Body | Hatchback | Station wagon |
| Country | France | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 62 kW (84 PS) 83 hp | 77 kW (105 PS) 103 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 51–85 kW (69–116 PS) 68–114 hp | 77–78 kW (105–106 PS) 103–105 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 13.5 s |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc 1.6 l | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,470 mm 176.0 in |
| Height | No data | 1,682 mm 66.2 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,905 mm 114.4 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 560 l 19.8 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 50 l 13.2 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 9.0 l/100 km 26.1 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,360/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 556 km 345 mi estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.