Bugatti Veyron Super Sport vs Koenigsegg Agera R: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Bugatti · 2010–2011
Veyron Super Sport
Price from €1,650,000 (2010)
- Power
- 883 kW1,201 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 2.5 s
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Koenigsegg · 2011–2014
Agera R
- Power
- 706 kW960 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 2.8 s
- Top speed
- 439 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,435 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Veyron Super Sport 2 Agera R 1
- City Agera R Length: 4,293 mm vs 4,462 mm
- Performance Veyron Super Sport 0–100 km/h: 2.5 s vs 2.8 s
- Off-road Veyron Super Sport Drive and body: All-wheel drive · Coupe vs Rear-wheel drive · Coupe
In plain words
Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is quicker: 0–100 km/h in 2.5 s against 2.8 s for Koenigsegg Agera R. Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is 169 mm longer than Koenigsegg Agera R (4,462 mm vs 4,293 mm). Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is the older design (from 2010); Koenigsegg Agera R arrived in 2011. On the catalog figures, the Koenigsegg Agera R is the pick for city; the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is the pick for performance and off-road. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Race Stats side by side
Each figure is a 0–100 score from the catalog numbers, the same as on the 1CARS Race cards. PI is the overall performance index (100–999) and its class D–S.
| Stat | Veyron Super Sport | Agera R |
|---|---|---|
| PI | S · 932 | S · 889 |
| Power | 100 | 99 |
| Grip | 83 | 68 |
| Handling | 79 | 76 |
| Top speed | 100 | 100 |
| Launch | 96 | 89 |
Grip and handling are estimates from drive type, weight, height and body (hover a figure to see where it comes from). 1CARS Race
Who wins a race?
Quarter-mile (402 m) drag from a standing start, dry road, no reaction time - the 1CARS Race physics on the catalog figures of these versions.
- 1 Veyron Super Sport8.0 · 883 kW (1,201 PS) 8.96 sat 303 km/h
- 2 Agera RAgera R · petrol · 706 kW (960 PS) 9.31 sat 299 km/h · +0.35 s
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Veyron Super Sport | Agera R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,462 mm175.7 in | 4,293 mm169.0 in −169 mm −6.7 in −3.8% |
| Width | 1,998 mm78.7 in | 1,996 mm78.6 in −2 mm −0.1 in −0.1% |
| Height | 1,204 mm47.4 in | 1,120 mm44.1 in −84 mm −3.3 in −7.0% |
| Wheelbase | 2,710 mm106.7 in | 2,662 mm104.8 in −48 mm −1.9 in −1.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Too wide | Too wide |
Difference vs Veyron Super Sport (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Bugatti Veyron Super Sport | Koenigsegg Agera R | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 8.0 · 883 kW (1,201 PS) | Agera R · petrol · 706 kW (960 PS) |
| Production years | 2010–2011 | 2011–2014 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Class | No data | Supercar |
| Country | France | Sweden |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 883 kW (1,201 PS) 1,184 hp Better | 706 kW (960 PS) 947 hp |
| Power, all versions | 883 kW (1,201 PS) 1,184 hp | 706–838 kW (960–1,139 PS) 947–1,124 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 1,500 Nm 1,106 lb-ft Better | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 2.5 s Better | 2.8 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 439 km/h 273 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 492 kW/t 599 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 8,000 cc · 16 cyl 8.0 l | 5,000 cc · 8 cyl 5.0 l |
| Gearbox | No data | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,462 mm 175.7 in | 4,293 mm 169.0 in |
| Width | 1,998 mm 78.7 in | 1,996 mm 78.6 in |
| Height | 1,204 mm 47.4 in | 1,120 mm 44.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710 mm 106.7 in | 2,662 mm 104.8 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 80 l 21.1 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 14.0 l/100 km 16.8 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €3,680/year estimated | No data |
| Price | ||
| Price | from €1,650,000 (2010) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.