Chery Tiggo 5 vs Geely Emgrand X7: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data — no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chery · 2017–2021
Tiggo 5 II
- Power
- 109 kW148 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 13.0 s
Geely · 2015
Emgrand X7
- Power
- 92 kW125 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- —
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Emgrand X7 Boot: 580 l vs 420 l
In plain words
Chery Tiggo 5 has more power: 109 kW (148 PS) against 92 kW (125 PS) for Geely Emgrand X7. Geely Emgrand X7 has the bigger boot: 580 l against 420 l. Chery Tiggo 5 is the older design (from 2013); Geely Emgrand X7 arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Geely Emgrand X7 is the pick for family. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Geely Emgrand X7 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Tiggo 5 II | Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 420 l14.8 cu ft | 580 l20.5 cu ft +160 l +5.7 cu ft +38.1% |
Difference vs Tiggo 5 II (±).
Full specifications
| Chery Tiggo 5 | Geely Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 · petrol · 109 kW (148 PS) | petrol · 92 kW (125 PS) |
| Production years | 2017–2021 | 2015 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 109 kW (148 PS) 146 hp Better | 92 kW (125 PS) 123 hp |
| Power, all versions | 104–113 kW (141–154 PS) 139–152 hp | 92–110 kW (125–150 PS) 123–148 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 13.0 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,500 cc · 4 cyl 1.5 l | No data |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 420 l 14.8 cu ft | 580 l 20.5 cu ft Better |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 8.4 l/100 km 28.0 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €2,210/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (5): Body, Class, Country, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure — only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.