Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Opel Antara: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Suzuki · 1998–2005
Grand Vitara I (FT/GT)
- Power
- 116 kW158 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 12.4 s
- Top speed
- 170 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,245 kg

Opel · 2006–2015
Antara
- Power
- 123 kW167 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Antara Length: 4,596 mm vs 4,700 mm
In plain words
Opel Antara has more power: 123 kW (167 PS) against 116 kW (158 PS) for Suzuki Grand Vitara. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 104 mm longer than Opel Antara (4,700 mm vs 4,596 mm). Suzuki Grand Vitara is the older design (from 1998); Opel Antara arrived in 2006. Suzuki Grand Vitara is still in production; Opel Antara is not. On the catalog figures, the Opel Antara is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Opel Antara yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Grand Vitara I (FT/GT) | Antara | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,700 mm185.0 in | 4,596 mm180.9 in −104 mm −4.1 in −2.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Grand Vitara I (FT/GT) (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Suzuki Grand Vitara | Opel Antara | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Grand Vitara I (FT/GT) · 116 kW (158 PS) | 2.4 · petrol · 123 kW (167 PS) |
| Production years | 1998–2005 | 2006–2015 |
| Body | SUV, Convertible | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | Japan | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 116 kW (158 PS) 156 hp | 123 kW (167 PS) 165 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 64–135 kW (87–184 PS) 86–181 hp | 103–183 kW (140–249 PS) 138–245 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 12.4 s | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 170 km/h 106 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 93 kW/t 113 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Petrol |
| Engine | 6 cyl | 2,400 cc 2.4 l |
| Gearbox | automatic | No data |
| Drive | Four-wheel drive (4×4) | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,700 mm 185.0 in | 4,596 mm 180.9 in |
| Width | No data | 1,850 mm 72.8 in |
| Height | No data | 1,761 mm 69.3 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,707 mm 106.6 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,245 kg 2,745 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 420 l 14.8 cu ft |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 10.9 l/100 km 21.6 mpg US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).