Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Renault Logan vs Chevrolet Cobalt: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Renault Logan

Renault · 2012–2020

Logan L52

C PI 456

Power
66 kW90 PS
Kerb mass
1,150 kg

Chevrolet Cobalt

Chevrolet · 2011–present

Cobalt II

Power
64 kW87 PS
Kerb mass
-

Add a third car

In plain words

Renault Logan has more power: 66 kW (90 PS) against 64 kW (87 PS) for Chevrolet Cobalt. Renault Logan is the older design (from 2004); Chevrolet Cobalt arrived in 2011. Chevrolet Cobalt is still in production; Renault Logan is not. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Chevrolet Cobalt yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

Logan L52Cobalt II
Width 1,733 mm68.2 in 1,514 mm59.6 in −219 mm −8.6 in −12.6%
Height 1,517 mm59.7 in 1,514 mm59.6 in −3 mm −0.1 in −0.2%
Wheelbase 2,634 mm103.7 in 2,620 mm103.1 in −14 mm −0.6 in −0.5%
Fits a standard garage? YesNo data

Difference vs Logan L52 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Full specifications

Renault LoganChevrolet Cobalt
General
Version 0.9 · petrol · 66 kW (90 PS) petrol · 64 kW (87 PS)
Production years 2012–2020 2011–present
Body Sedan Sedan
Country France United States
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 66 kW (90 PS) 89 hp Better 64 kW (87 PS) 86 hp
Power, all versions 55–75 kW (75–102 PS) 74–101 hp 64–77 kW (87–105 PS) 86–103 hp
Power per tonne 57 kW/t 70 hp/ton calculated No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 900 cc · 3 cyl 0.9 l No data
Drive Front-wheel drive No data
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,348 mm 171.2 in No data
Width 1,733 mm 68.2 in 1,514 mm 59.6 in
Height 1,517 mm 59.7 in 1,514 mm 59.6 in
Wheelbase 2,634 mm 103.7 in 2,620 mm 103.1 in
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 1,150 kg 2,535 lb No data
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. No data 545 l 19.2 cu ft
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. No data 46 l 12.2 gal US
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. 5.6 l/100 km 42.0 mpg US No data
CO₂ 139 g/km No data
Fuel cost per year €1,470/year estimated No data

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.