Renault Kaptur vs Opel Mokka: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Renault · 2016–2023
Kaptur
- Power
- 84 kW114 PS
Opel · 2012–2019
Mokka
- Power
- 103 kW140 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: Kaptur 1 Mokka 1
- Family Kaptur Boot: 387 l vs 356 l
- Off-road Mokka Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · Hatchback
In plain words
Opel Mokka has more power: 103 kW (140 PS) against 84 kW (114 PS) for Renault Kaptur. Renault Kaptur has the bigger boot: 387 l against 356 l. Opel Mokka is the older design (from 2012); Renault Kaptur arrived in 2016. Opel Mokka is still in production; Renault Kaptur is not. On the catalog figures, the Renault Kaptur is the pick for family; the Opel Mokka is the pick for off-road.
Size and weight
| Kaptur | Mokka | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 387 l13.7 cu ft | 356 l12.6 cu ft −31 l −1.1 cu ft −8.0% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Kaptur (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Renault Kaptur | Opel Mokka | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 · petrol · 84 kW (114 PS) | 1.8 · petrol · 103 kW (140 PS) |
| Production years | 2016–2023 | 2012–2019 |
| Body | Hatchback | SUV |
| Class | No data | SUV / crossover |
| Country | France | Germany |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 84 kW (114 PS) 113 hp | 103 kW (140 PS) 138 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 84–110 kW (114–150 PS) 113–148 hp | 81–112 kW (110–152 PS) 109–150 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 156 Nm 115 lb-ft | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l | 1,800 cc 1.8 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,278 mm 168.4 in |
| Width | No data | 1,777 mm 70.0 in |
| Height | No data | 1,646 mm 64.8 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 2,555 mm 100.6 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 387 l 13.7 cu ft Better | 356 l 12.6 cu ft |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★★ (2012) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).