KamAZ-6520 vs Ural-63685: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
KamAZ · 2002
KamAZ-6520
- Power
- 294 kW400 PS
- Top speed
- 90 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 12,950 kg
Ural · 2005
Ural-63685
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 221 kW300 PS
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
In plain words
Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Ural-63685 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| KamAZ-6520 | Ural-63685 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 11.8 740.63-400 · diesel · 294 kW (400 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2002 | 2005 |
| Body | Dump truck | Dump truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 294 kW (400 PS) 394 hp Better | 221 kW (300 PS) 296 hp |
| Power, all versions | 235–294 kW (320–400 PS) 315–394 hp | 221 kW (300 PS) 296 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 1,766 Nm 1,303 lb-ft | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 90 km/h 56 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 23 kW/t 28 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine | 11,760 cc 11.8 l | No data |
| Engine code | 740.63-400 | No data |
| Gearbox | 16-speed manual | No data |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 12,950 kg 28,550 lb | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 350 l 92.5 gal US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).