KamAZ-4326 vs GAZ-Sadko: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
KamAZ · 1995–present
KamAZ-4326
- Power
- 177 kW241 PS
- Top speed
- -
GAZ · 1997
GAZ-Sadko
- Power
- 99 kW135 PS
- Top speed
- 93 km/h
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Running costs GAZ-Sadko Fuel per year: €4,160 vs €7,430 (estimated)
In plain words
KamAZ-4326 has more power: 177 kW (241 PS) against 99 kW (135 PS) for GAZ-Sadko. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €7,430 (KamAZ-4326), €4,160 (GAZ-Sadko) (estimated). KamAZ-4326 is the older design (from 1995); GAZ-Sadko arrived in 1997. KamAZ-4326 is still in production; GAZ-Sadko is not. On the catalog figures, the GAZ-Sadko is the pick for running costs.
Full specifications
| KamAZ-4326 | GAZ-Sadko | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 10.8 · 177 kW (241 PS) | 4.4 · 99 kW (135 PS) |
| Production years | 1995–present | 1997 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp Better | 99 kW (135 PS) 133 hp |
| Power, all versions | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp | 86–99 kW (117–135 PS) 115–133 hp |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 93 km/h 58 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine | 10,800 cc 10.8 l | 4,430 cc 4.4 l |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Height | 3,395 mm 133.7 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 4,200 mm 165.4 in | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 295 l 77.9 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 30.0 l/100 km 7.8 mpg US | 16.8 l/100 km 14.0 mpg US Better |
| Fuel cost per year | €7,430/year estimated | €4,160/year estimated Better |
| Range on a full tank | 983 km 611 mi estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.