KamAZ-4308 vs GAZ GAZon Next: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
KamAZ · 2003
KamAZ-4308
- Power
- 180 kW245 PS
- Top speed
- 100 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 6,200 kg
GAZ · 2014–present
GAZon Next
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Off-road GAZon Next Drive and body: Rear-wheel drive · Truck vs Rear-wheel drive · Truck
In plain words
KamAZ-4308 has more power: 180 kW (245 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for GAZ GAZon Next. KamAZ-4308 is the older design (from 2004); GAZ GAZon Next arrived in 2014. On the catalog figures, the GAZ GAZon Next is the pick for off-road. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the GAZ GAZon Next yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| KamAZ-4308 | GAZ GAZon Next | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | diesel · 180 kW (245 PS) | 4.4 YaMZ-534 · diesel · 110 kW (150 PS) |
| Production years | 2003 | 2014–present |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 180 kW (245 PS) 241 hp Better | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp |
| Power, all versions | 103–180 kW (140–245 PS) 138–241 hp | 110–112 kW (150–152 PS) 148–150 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 778 Nm 574 lb-ft | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 100 km/h 62 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 29 kW/t 35 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine | 6 cyl | 4,430 cc 4.4 l |
| Engine code | No data | YaMZ-534 |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 5,200 mm 204.7 in | No data |
| Width | 2,600 mm 102.4 in | No data |
| Height | 3,900 mm 153.5 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 4,200 mm 165.4 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 6,200 kg 13,669 lb | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 210 l 55.5 gal US | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 17.0 l/100 km 13.8 mpg US | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €4,210/year estimated | No data |
| Range on a full tank | 1,235 km 767 mi estimated | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.