MAZ-200 vs ZIL-130: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
MAZ · 1950–1965
MAZ-200
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 88 kW120 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
ZIL · 1962–1994
ZIL-130
- Power
- 81 kW110 PS
- Kerb mass
- 4,300 kg
In plain words
MAZ-200 is the older design (from 1950); ZIL-130 arrived in 1962. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the MAZ-200 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| MAZ-200 | ZIL-130 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | No data | ZIL-157 · 81 kW (110 PS) |
| Production years | 1950–1965 | 1962–1994 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | Soviet Union (USSR) | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 88 kW (120 PS) 118 hp Better | 81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp |
| Power, all versions | 88 kW (120 PS) 118 hp | 81–110 kW (110–150 PS) 109–148 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 19 kW/t 23 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | No data |
| Engine | No data | 6 cyl |
| Engine code | No data | ZIL-157 |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 6,675 mm 262.8 in |
| Width | No data | 2,500 mm 98.4 in |
| Height | No data | 2,400 mm 94.5 in |
| Wheelbase | No data | 3,800 mm 149.6 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 4,300 kg 9,480 lb |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 170 l 44.9 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Country.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).