Lada Granta vs Renault Logan: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Lada · 2011–present
Granta
- Power
- 72 kW98 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Renault · 2012–2020
Logan L52
- Power
- 66 kW90 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,150 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Granta Length: 4,247 mm vs 4,348 mm; Width: 1,700 mm vs 1,733 mm
In plain words
Lada Granta has more power: 72 kW (98 PS) against 66 kW (90 PS) for Renault Logan. Renault Logan is 101 mm longer than Lada Granta (4,348 mm vs 4,247 mm). Renault Logan is the older design (from 2004); Lada Granta arrived in 2011. Lada Granta is still in production; Renault Logan is not. On the catalog figures, the Lada Granta is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Lada Granta yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Granta | Logan L52 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,247 mm167.2 in | 4,348 mm171.2 in +101 mm +4.0 in +2.4% |
| Width | 1,700 mm66.9 in | 1,733 mm68.2 in +33 mm +1.3 in +1.9% |
| Height | 1,500 mm59.1 in | 1,517 mm59.7 in +17 mm +0.7 in +1.1% |
| Wheelbase | 2,476 mm97.5 in | 2,634 mm103.7 in +158 mm +6.2 in +6.4% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Granta (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lada Granta | Renault Logan | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 72 kW (98 PS) | 0.9 · petrol · 66 kW (90 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–present | 2012–2020 |
| Body | Sedan, Hatchback | Sedan |
| Country | No data | France |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 72 kW (98 PS) 97 hp Better | 66 kW (90 PS) 89 hp |
| Power, all versions | 64–87 kW (87–118 PS) 86–117 hp | 55–75 kW (75–102 PS) 74–101 hp |
| Power per tonne | No data | 57 kW/t 70 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | No data | 900 cc · 3 cyl 0.9 l |
| Gearbox | automatic | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,247 mm 167.2 in | 4,348 mm 171.2 in |
| Width | 1,700 mm 66.9 in | 1,733 mm 68.2 in |
| Height | 1,500 mm 59.1 in | 1,517 mm 59.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,476 mm 97.5 in | 2,634 mm 103.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,150 kg 2,535 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 520 l 18.4 cu ft | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 5.6 l/100 km 42.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | No data | 139 g/km |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,470/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.