Skoda Rapid vs Hyundai Solaris: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Skoda · 1984–1990
Rapid Typ 743 / 747
- Power
- 43 kW58 PS
- Top speed
- 153 km/h
Hyundai · 2011–2017
Solaris RB
- Power
- 90 kW122 PS
- Top speed
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Rapid Typ 743 / 747 Length: 4,200 mm vs 4,370 mm
In plain words
Hyundai Solaris has more power: 90 kW (122 PS) against 43 kW (58 PS) for Skoda Rapid. Hyundai Solaris is 170 mm longer than Skoda Rapid (4,370 mm vs 4,200 mm). Skoda Rapid is the older design (from 1935); Hyundai Solaris arrived in 2011. On the catalog figures, the Skoda Rapid is the pick for city.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Rapid Typ 743 / 747 | Solaris RB | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,200 mm165.4 in | 4,370 mm172.0 in +170 mm +6.7 in +4.0% |
| Height | 1,380 mm54.3 in | 1,700 mm66.9 in +320 mm +12.6 in +23.2% |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm94.5 in | 2,570 mm101.2 in +170 mm +6.7 in +7.1% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs Rapid Typ 743 / 747 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Skoda Rapid | Hyundai Solaris | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Rapid Typ 743 / 747 · 130 · 43 kW (58 PS) | 1.6 · 90 kW (122 PS) |
| Production years | 1984–1990 | 2011–2017 |
| Body | Coupe | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | Czech Republic | South Korea |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 43 kW (58 PS) 58 hp | 90 kW (122 PS) 121 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 23–92 kW (31–125 PS) 31–123 hp | 79–90 kW (107–122 PS) 106–121 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 98 Nm 72 lb-ft | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 153 km/h 95 mph | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,289 cc · 4 cyl 1.3 l | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl 1.6 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,200 mm 165.4 in | 4,370 mm 172.0 in |
| Width | 1,610 mm 63.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,380 mm 54.3 in | 1,700 mm 66.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm 94.5 in | 2,570 mm 101.2 in |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 5.0 l/100 km 47.0 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €1,310/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.