Skoda Rapid vs Lada Vesta: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data — no editorial review of this pair yet.

Skoda · 1984–1990
Rapid Typ 743 / 747
- Power
- 43 kW58 PS
- Top speed
- 153 km/h
- Kerb mass
- —

Lada · 2015–present
Vesta
- Power
- 78 kW106 PS
- Top speed
- —
- Kerb mass
- 1,190 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Rapid Typ 743 / 747 Length: 4,200 mm vs 4,410 mm; Width: 1,610 mm vs 1,764 mm
In plain words
Lada Vesta has more power: 78 kW (106 PS) against 43 kW (58 PS) for Skoda Rapid. Lada Vesta is 210 mm longer than Skoda Rapid (4,410 mm vs 4,200 mm). Skoda Rapid is the older design (from 1935); Lada Vesta arrived in 2015. Lada Vesta is still in production; Skoda Rapid is not. On the catalog figures, the Skoda Rapid is the pick for city. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Skoda Rapid yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
Side view to scale, all cars from the front bumper.
| Rapid Typ 743 / 747 | Vesta | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,200 mm165.4 in | 4,410 mm173.6 in +210 mm +8.3 in +5.0% |
| Width | 1,610 mm63.4 in | 1,764 mm69.4 in +154 mm +6.1 in +9.6% |
| Height | 1,380 mm54.3 in | 1,497 mm58.9 in +117 mm +4.6 in +8.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm94.5 in | 2,635 mm103.7 in +235 mm +9.3 in +9.8% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | Yes |
Difference vs Rapid Typ 743 / 747 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Skoda Rapid | Lada Vesta | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | Rapid Typ 743 / 747 · 130 · 43 kW (58 PS) | 1.6 · 78 kW (106 PS) |
| Production years | 1984–1990 | 2015–present |
| Body | Coupe | Sedan |
| Country | Czech Republic | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 43 kW (58 PS) 58 hp | 78 kW (106 PS) 105 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 23–92 kW (31–125 PS) 31–123 hp | 78–107 kW (106–145 PS) 105–143 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 98 Nm 72 lb-ft | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 153 km/h 95 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | No data | 66 kW/t 80 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,289 cc · 4 cyl 1.3 l | 1,600 cc 1.6 l |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual | 5-speed automated manual |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,200 mm 165.4 in | 4,410 mm 173.6 in |
| Width | 1,610 mm 63.4 in | 1,764 mm 69.4 in |
| Height | 1,380 mm 54.3 in | 1,497 mm 58.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm 94.5 in | 2,635 mm 103.7 in |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 480 l 17.0 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure — only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).