Skoda Kodiaq vs Chery Tiggo 8: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Skoda · 2023–present

Kodiaq II

C PI 441

Version (8 versions)

Power: 110 kW150 PS
0–100 km/h: 9.7 s
Top speed: 207 km/h
Kerb mass: 1,661 kg

Version spec sheet

Chery · 2018

Tiggo 8

Version (2 versions)

Power: 108 kW147 PS
0–100 km/h: -
Top speed: -
Kerb mass: -

Add a third car

In plain words

Skoda Kodiaq has more power: 110 kW (150 PS) against 108 kW (147 PS) for Chery Tiggo 8. Skoda Kodiaq is the older design (from 2016); Chery Tiggo 8 arrived in 2018. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Chery Tiggo 8 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

General
	Skoda Kodiaq	Chery Tiggo 8
Version	Kodiaq II · 1.5 TSI mHEV · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS)	108 kW (147 PS)
Production years	2023–present	2018
Body	SUV	SUV
Class	SUV / crossover	SUV / crossover
Country	Czech Republic	China
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load.	110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp	108 kW (147 PS) 145 hp
Power, all versions	92–195 kW (125–265 PS) 123–261 hp	90–187 kW (122–254 PS) 121–251 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills.	No data	210 Nm 155 lb-ft
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads.	9.7 s	No data
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it.	207 km/h 129 mph	No data
Power per tonne	66 kW/t 81 hp/ton calculated	No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Gearbox	dual-clutch	No data
Drive	Front-wheel drive	No data
Dimensions and weight
Length	4,758 mm 187.3 in	No data
Width	1,864 mm 73.4 in	No data
Height	1,679 mm 66.1 in	No data
Wheelbase	2,789 mm 109.8 in	No data
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy.	1,661 kg 3,662 lb	No data
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram.	910 l 32.1 cu ft	No data
Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops.	55 l 14.5 gal US	No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip.	6.0 l/100 km 39.2 mpg US	No data
CO₂	136 g/km	No data
Fuel cost per year	€1,580/year estimated	No data
Range on a full tank	917 km 570 mi estimated	No data
Safety
Euro NCAP	★★★★★ (2024)	No data

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.