Daewoo Gentra vs Geely Emgrand EC7: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Daewoo · 2013–2015
Gentra
- Power
- 79 kW107 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.9 s

Geely · 2009–2016
Emgrand EC7
- Power
- 72 kW98 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Gentra Length: 4,515 mm vs 4,631 mm
In plain words
Daewoo Gentra has more power: 79 kW (107 PS) against 72 kW (98 PS) for Geely Emgrand EC7. Geely Emgrand EC7 is 116 mm longer than Daewoo Gentra (4,631 mm vs 4,515 mm). Geely Emgrand EC7 is the older design (from 2009); Daewoo Gentra arrived in 2013. On the catalog figures, the Daewoo Gentra is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Geely Emgrand EC7 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Gentra | Emgrand EC7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,515 mm177.8 in | 4,631 mm182.3 in +116 mm +4.6 in +2.6% |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm102.4 in | 2,650 mm104.3 in +50 mm +2.0 in +1.9% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Gentra (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Daewoo Gentra | Geely Emgrand EC7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.5 · petrol · 79 kW (107 PS) | 1.5 · 72 kW (98 PS) |
| Production years | 2013–2015 | 2009–2016 |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | Uzbekistan | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 79 kW (107 PS) 106 hp Better | 72 kW (98 PS) 97 hp |
| Power, all versions | 79 kW (107 PS) 106 hp | 72–93 kW (98–126 PS) 97–125 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 141 Nm 104 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 11.9 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,500 cc 1.5 l | 1,500 cc 1.5 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,515 mm 177.8 in | 4,631 mm 182.3 in |
| Width | No data | 1,789 mm 70.4 in |
| Height | No data | 1,470 mm 57.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm 102.4 in | 2,650 mm 104.3 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 405 l 14.3 cu ft | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 60 l 15.9 gal US | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | No data | ★★★★☆ (2011) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Fuel, Engine, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).