SsangYong Rexton W vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

SsangYong · 2012–2017

Rexton W

C PI 403

Version

Power: 137 kW186 PS
0–100 km/h: 11.3 s

Mitsubishi · 2008–2015

Pajero Sport II

Version (4 versions)

Power: 147 kW200 PS
0–100 km/h: -

Add a third car

In plain words

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport has more power: 147 kW (200 PS) against 137 kW (186 PS) for SsangYong Rexton W. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport is the older design (from 1996); SsangYong Rexton W arrived in 2012. Mitsubishi Pajero Sport is still in production; SsangYong Rexton W is not. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Full specifications

General
	SsangYong Rexton W	Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
Version	137 kW (186 PS)	3.2 · diesel · 147 kW (200 PS)
Production years	2012–2017	2008–2015
Body	SUV	SUV
Class	SUV / crossover	SUV / crossover
Country	South Korea	Japan
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load.	137 kW (186 PS) 184 hp	147 kW (200 PS) 197 hp Better
Power, all versions	137 kW (186 PS) 184 hp	71–163 kW (97–222 PS) 95–219 hp
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads.	11.3 s	No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel	Diesel	Diesel
Engine	No data	3,200 cc 3.2 l
Drive	No data	All-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length	4,755 mm 187.2 in	No data
Width	1,900 mm 74.8 in	No data
Height	1,840 mm 72.4 in	No data
Wheelbase	2,835 mm 111.6 in	No data
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip.	7.6 l/100 km 30.9 mpg US	No data
Fuel cost per year	€1,880/year estimated	No data

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.