Chevrolet Cobalt vs Lada Granta: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Chevrolet · 2011–present
Cobalt II
- Power
- 64 kW87 PS
Lada · 2011–present
Granta
- Power
- 72 kW98 PS
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Cobalt II Boot: 545 l vs 520 l
In plain words
Lada Granta has more power: 72 kW (98 PS) against 64 kW (87 PS) for Chevrolet Cobalt. Chevrolet Cobalt has the bigger boot: 545 l against 520 l. On the catalog figures, the Chevrolet Cobalt is the pick for family.
Size and weight
| Cobalt II | Granta | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 1,514 mm59.6 in | 1,700 mm66.9 in +186 mm +7.3 in +12.3% |
| Height | 1,514 mm59.6 in | 1,500 mm59.1 in −14 mm −0.6 in −0.9% |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm103.1 in | 2,476 mm97.5 in −144 mm −5.7 in −5.5% |
| Boot | 545 l19.2 cu ft | 520 l18.4 cu ft −25 l −0.9 cu ft −4.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | No data | Yes |
Difference vs Cobalt II (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Chevrolet Cobalt | Lada Granta | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | petrol · 64 kW (87 PS) | 72 kW (98 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–present | 2011–present |
| Body | Sedan | Sedan, Hatchback |
| Country | United States | No data |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 64 kW (87 PS) 86 hp | 72 kW (98 PS) 97 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 64–77 kW (87–105 PS) 86–103 hp | 64–87 kW (87–118 PS) 86–117 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Gearbox | No data | automatic |
| Drive | No data | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | No data | 4,247 mm 167.2 in |
| Width | 1,514 mm 59.6 in | 1,700 mm 66.9 in |
| Height | 1,514 mm 59.6 in | 1,500 mm 59.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm 103.1 in | 2,476 mm 97.5 in |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 545 l 19.2 cu ft Better | 520 l 18.4 cu ft |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 46 l 12.2 gal US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Production years, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).