Subaru BRZ vs Mazda RX-8: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Subaru · 2021–present
BRZ ZD8
- Power
- 173 kW235 PS
- Top speed
- 225 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,350 kg
Mazda · 2003–2012
RX-8 SE3P
Price from €29,600 (2003)
- Power
- 141–177 kW192–241 PS
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: BRZ ZD8 2 RX-8 SE3P 0
- Running costs BRZ ZD8 Fuel per year: €2,310 vs €3,260 (estimated)
- Off-road BRZ ZD8 Drive and body: Rear-wheel drive · Coupe vs Rear-wheel drive · Coupe
In plain words
At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €2,310 (Subaru BRZ), €3,260 (Mazda RX-8) (estimated). Mazda RX-8 is the older design (from 2003); Subaru BRZ arrived in 2012. Subaru BRZ is still in production; Mazda RX-8 is not. On the catalog figures, the Subaru BRZ is the pick for running costs and off-road. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Mazda RX-8 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Subaru BRZ | Mazda RX-8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | BRZ ZD8 · 2.4 · petrol · 173 kW (235 PS) | 1.3 L 2 cyl Automatic (S6) · 2011 (EPA) |
| Production years | 2021–present | 2003–2012 |
| Body | Coupe | Coupe |
| Class | Sports car | Sports car |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 173 kW (235 PS) 232 hp | 141–177 kW (192–241 PS) 189–237 hp |
| Power, all versions | 147–173 kW (200–235 PS) 197–232 hp | 141–177 kW (192–241 PS) 189–237 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | No data |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 225 km/h 140 mph | No data |
| Power per tonne | 128 kW/t 156 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,387 cc 2.4 l | 1,300 cc · 2 cyl 1.3 l |
| Engine code | FA24 | No data |
| Gearbox | No data | 6-speed automatic |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 8.8 l/100 km 26.7 mpg US Better | 12.4 l/100 km 19.0 mpg US |
| CO₂ | 200 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €2,310/year estimated Better | €3,260/year estimated |
| Price | ||
| Price | No data | from €29,600 (2003) |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (5): Body, Class, Country, Fuel, Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.