KamAZ-5320 vs KrAZ-250: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
KamAZ · 1976–2000
KamAZ-5320
- Power
- 154 kW209 PS
- Top speed
- 50 km/h
KrAZ · 1978–1992
KrAZ-250
- Power
- 177 kW241 PS
- Top speed
- -
In plain words
KrAZ-250 has more power: 177 kW (241 PS) against 154 kW (209 PS) for KamAZ-5320. KamAZ-5320 is the older design (from 1976); KrAZ-250 arrived in 1978.
Full specifications
| KamAZ-5320 | KrAZ-250 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | diesel · 154 kW (209 PS) | diesel · 177 kW (241 PS) |
| Production years | 1976–2000 | 1978–1992 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | Soviet Union (USSR) | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 154 kW (209 PS) 207 hp | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 132–154 kW (179–209 PS) 177–207 hp | 177 kW (241 PS) 237 hp |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | 50 km/h 31 mph | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 165 l 43.6 gal US |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 35.0 l/100 km 6.7 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | No data | €8,660/year estimated |
| Range on a full tank | No data | 471 km 293 mi estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel.