SsangYong Actyon vs Suzuki Grand Vitara: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
SsangYong · 2006–2015
Actyon
- Power
- 110 kW150 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
- Top speed
- -
- Kerb mass
- -
Suzuki · 1998–2005
Grand Vitara I (FT/GT)
- Power
- 116 kW158 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 12.4 s
- Top speed
- 170 km/h
- Kerb mass
- 1,245 kg
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- City Actyon Length: 4,455 mm vs 4,700 mm
In plain words
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more power: 116 kW (158 PS) against 110 kW (150 PS) for SsangYong Actyon. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 245 mm longer than SsangYong Actyon (4,700 mm vs 4,455 mm). Suzuki Grand Vitara is the older design (from 1998); SsangYong Actyon arrived in 2006. Suzuki Grand Vitara is still in production; SsangYong Actyon is not. On the catalog figures, the SsangYong Actyon is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the SsangYong Actyon yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Actyon | Grand Vitara I (FT/GT) | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,455 mm175.4 in | 4,700 mm185.0 in +245 mm +9.6 in +5.5% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Tight | No data |
Difference vs Actyon (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| SsangYong Actyon | Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · petrol · 110 kW (150 PS) | Grand Vitara I (FT/GT) · 116 kW (158 PS) |
| Production years | 2006–2015 | 1998–2005 |
| Body | SUV | SUV, Convertible |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 110 kW (150 PS) 148 hp | 116 kW (158 PS) 156 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 104–110 kW (141–150 PS) 139–148 hp | 64–135 kW (87–184 PS) 86–181 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | No data | 12.4 s |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 170 km/h 106 mph |
| Power per tonne | No data | 93 kW/t 113 hp/ton calculated |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | No data |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | 6 cyl |
| Gearbox | No data | automatic |
| Drive | All-wheel drive | Four-wheel drive (4×4) |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,455 mm 175.4 in | 4,700 mm 185.0 in |
| Width | 1,880 mm 74.0 in | No data |
| Height | 1,735 mm 68.3 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,740 mm 107.9 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | No data | 1,245 kg 2,745 lb |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | No data | 10.9 l/100 km 21.6 mpg US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).