Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Mazda CX-7 ER vs Nissan X-Trail T33: size comparison

  • Length About the same length
  • Width CX-7 ER 32 mm1 in wider
  • Height X-Trail T33 74 mm3 in taller
  • Boot X-Trail T33 105 L3.7 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

CX-7 ER Mazda · 2006–2012 · SUV CX-7 ER 4,676 × 1,872 × 1,646 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 2 in × 5 ft 5 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

X-Trail T33 Nissan · 2020–present · SUV X-Trail T33 4,680 × 1,840 × 1,720 mm15 ft 4 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 8 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: CX-7 ER
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: X-Trail T33
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,750 mmWheelbase 9 ft 0 inLength 4,676 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,646 mm5 ft 5 inWheelbase 2,705 mmWheelbase 8 ft 10 inLength 4,680 mmLength 15 ft 4 in1,720 mm5 ft 8 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The CX-7 ER is 4 mm0.2 in shorter, 32 mm1 in wider and 74 mm3 in lower than the X-Trail T33. Its wheelbase is 45 mm2 in longer.

DimensionCX-7 ERX-Trail T33Difference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,676 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,676 mm4,680 mm15 ft 4 in15 ft 4 in4,680 mm −4 mm−0.2 in −0.1%
Width1,872 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,872 mm1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm +32 mm+1 in +1.7%
Height1,646 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,646 mm1,720 mm5 ft 8 in5 ft 8 in1,720 mm −74 mm−3 in −4.3%
Wheelbase2,750 mm9 ft 0 in9 ft 0 in2,750 mm2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm +45 mm+2 in +1.7%
Footprint8.75 m²94.2 sq ft94.2 sq ft8.75 m²8.61 m²92.7 sq ft92.7 sq ft8.61 m² +0.14 m²+1.5 sq ft +1.7%
Boot455 L16.1 cu ft16.1 cu ft455 L560 L19.8 cu ft19.8 cu ft560 L −105 L−3.7 cu ft −18.8%
Kerb weightNot in our catalog yet1,664–1,924 kg3,668–4,242 lb3,668–4,242 lb1,664–1,924 kg -

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

CX-7 ER

Single garage
Tight 824 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 564 mm1 ft 10 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 324 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 314 mm1 ft 0 in each side

X-Trail T33

Single garage
Tight 820 mm2 ft 8 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 320 mm1 ft 1 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Mazda CX-7 ER or the Nissan X-Trail T33?

The Mazda CX-7 ER is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The CX-7 ER is 4 mm shorter, 32 mm wider and 74 mm lower than the X-Trail T33. Its wheelbase is 45 mm longer.

Will the Mazda CX-7 ER and the Nissan X-Trail T33 fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mazda CX-7 ER fits, but it is tight to get out (824 mm to spare in length, 564 mm each side). The Nissan X-Trail T33 fits, but it is tight to get out (820 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nissan X-Trail T33: 560 L against 455 L in the Mazda CX-7 ER (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error