Size comparison · drawn to scale
Kia Niro I vs Volkswagen T-Roc II: size comparison
- Length T-Roc II 18 mm0.7 in longer
- Width T-Roc II 23 mm0.9 in wider
- Height T-Roc II 28 mm1 in taller
- Boot T-Roc II 25 L0.9 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:20 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Niro I is 18 mm0.7 in shorter, 23 mm0.9 in narrower and 28 mm1 in lower than the T-Roc II. Its wheelbase is 71 mm3 in longer.
| Dimension | Niro I | T-Roc II | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,355 mm14 ft 3 in14 ft 3 in4,355 mm | 4,373 mm14 ft 4 in14 ft 4 in4,373 mm | −18 mm−0.7 in −0.4% |
| Width | 1,805 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,805 mm | 1,828 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,828 mm | −23 mm−0.9 in −1.3% |
| Height | 1,545 mm5 ft 1 in5 ft 1 in1,545 mm | 1,573 mm5 ft 2 in5 ft 2 in1,573 mm | −28 mm−1 in −1.8% |
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,700 mm | 2,629 mm8 ft 8 in8 ft 8 in2,629 mm | +71 mm+3 in +2.7% |
| Footprint | 7.86 m²84.6 sq ft84.6 sq ft7.86 m² | 7.99 m²86.0 sq ft86.0 sq ft7.99 m² | −0.13 m²−1.4 sq ft −1.7% |
| Boot | 450 L15.9 cu ft15.9 cu ft450 L | 475 L16.8 cu ft16.8 cu ft475 L | −25 L−0.9 cu ft −5.3% |
| Kerb weight | 1,667–1,812 kg3,675–3,995 lb3,675–3,995 lb1,667–1,812 kg | Not in our catalog yet | - |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Niro I
- Single garage
- Tight 1,145 mm3 ft 9 in to spare in length, 598 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 645 mm2 ft 1 in to spare in length, 348 mm1 ft 2 in each side
T-Roc II
- Single garage
- Tight 1,127 mm3 ft 8 in to spare in length, 586 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 627 mm2 ft 1 in to spare in length, 336 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Kia Niro I or the Volkswagen T-Roc II?
The Volkswagen T-Roc II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Niro I is 18 mm shorter, 23 mm narrower and 28 mm lower than the T-Roc II. Its wheelbase is 71 mm longer.
Will the Kia Niro I and the Volkswagen T-Roc II fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Kia Niro I fits, but it is tight to get out (1,145 mm to spare in length, 598 mm each side). The Volkswagen T-Roc II fits, but it is tight to get out (1,127 mm to spare in length, 586 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen T-Roc II: 475 L against 450 L in the Kia Niro I (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.