Size comparison · drawn to scale
BMW M4 (G82/G83) vs Bentley Continental GT II: size comparison
- Length Continental GT II 12 mm0.5 in longer
- Width Continental GT II 57 mm2 in wider
- Height Continental GT II 11 mm0.4 in taller
- Boot M4 (G82/G83) 82 L2.9 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The M4 (G82/G83) is 12 mm0.5 in shorter, 57 mm2 in narrower and 11 mm0.4 in lower than the Continental GT II. Its wheelbase is 111 mm4 in longer.
| Dimension | M4 (G82/G83) | Continental GT II | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,794 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,794 mm | 4,806 mm15 ft 9 in15 ft 9 in4,806 mm | −12 mm−0.5 in −0.2% |
| Width | 1,887 mm6 ft 2 in6 ft 2 in1,887 mm | 1,944 mm6 ft 5 in6 ft 5 in1,944 mm | −57 mm−2 in −2.9% |
| Height | 1,393 mm4 ft 7 in4 ft 7 in1,393 mm | 1,404 mm4 ft 7 in4 ft 7 in1,404 mm | −11 mm−0.4 in −0.8% |
| Wheelbase | 2,857 mm9 ft 4 in9 ft 4 in2,857 mm | 2,746 mm9 ft 0 in9 ft 0 in2,746 mm | +111 mm+4 in +4.0% |
| Footprint | 9.05 m²97.4 sq ft97.4 sq ft9.05 m² | 9.34 m²100.6 sq ft100.6 sq ft9.34 m² | −0.30 m²−3.2 sq ft −3.2% |
| Boot | 440 L15.5 cu ft15.5 cu ft440 L | 358 L12.6 cu ft12.6 cu ft358 L | +82 L+2.9 cu ft +22.9% |
| Kerb weight | 1,625–1,953 kg3,583–4,306 lb3,583–4,306 lb1,625–1,953 kg | 2,320 kg5,115 lb5,115 lb2,320 kg | −695 kg−1,532 lb −30.0% |
| Price new (EUR) | Not in our catalog yet | from about €188,972 (2011) | - |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions. New prices are list prices in EUR entered by our editors, with the year.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
M4 (G82/G83)
- Single garage
- Tight 706 mm2 ft 4 in to spare in length, 557 mm1 ft 10 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 206 mm8 in to spare in length, 307 mm1 ft 0 in each side
Continental GT II
- Single garage
- Tight 694 mm2 ft 3 in to spare in length, 528 mm1 ft 9 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 194 mm8 in to spare in length, 278 mm11 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the BMW M4 (G82/G83) or the Bentley Continental GT II?
The Bentley Continental GT II is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The M4 (G82/G83) is 12 mm shorter, 57 mm narrower and 11 mm lower than the Continental GT II. Its wheelbase is 111 mm longer.
Will the BMW M4 (G82/G83) and the Bentley Continental GT II fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The BMW M4 (G82/G83) fits, but it is tight to get out (706 mm to spare in length, 557 mm each side). The Bentley Continental GT II fits, but it is tight to get out (694 mm to spare in length, 528 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW M4 (G82/G83): 440 L against 358 L in the Bentley Continental GT II (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.