Size comparison · drawn to scale
Renault Austral RHN vs Mitsubishi Outlander CU: size comparison
- Length Outlander CU 17 mm0.7 in longer
- Width Austral RHN 75 mm3 in wider
- Height Outlander CU 25 mm1 in taller
- Boot Austral RHN 125 L4.4 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Austral RHN is 17 mm0.7 in shorter, 75 mm3 in wider and 25 mm1 in lower than the Outlander CU. Its wheelbase is 42 mm2 in longer.
| Dimension | Austral RHN | Outlander CU | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,533 mm14 ft 10 in14 ft 10 in4,533 mm | 4,550 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,550 mm | −17 mm−0.7 in −0.4% |
| Width | 1,825 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,825 mm | 1,750 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,750 mm | +75 mm+3 in +4.3% |
| Height | 1,645 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,645 mm | 1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm | −25 mm−1 in −1.5% |
| Wheelbase | 2,667 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,667 mm | 2,625 mm8 ft 7 in8 ft 7 in2,625 mm | +42 mm+2 in +1.6% |
| Footprint | 8.27 m²89.0 sq ft89.0 sq ft8.27 m² | 7.96 m²85.7 sq ft85.7 sq ft7.96 m² | +0.31 m²+3.3 sq ft +3.9% |
| Boot | 527 L18.6 cu ft18.6 cu ft527 L | 402 L14.2 cu ft14.2 cu ft402 L | +125 L+4.4 cu ft +31.1% |
| Kerb weight | 1,685 kg3,715 lb3,715 lb1,685 kg | 1,515 kg3,340 lb3,340 lb1,515 kg | +170 kg+375 lb +11.2% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Austral RHN
- Single garage
- Tight 967 mm3 ft 2 in to spare in length, 588 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 467 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 338 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Outlander CU
- Single garage
- Fits 950 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 625 mm2 ft 1 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 450 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 375 mm1 ft 3 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Renault Austral RHN or the Mitsubishi Outlander CU?
The Renault Austral RHN is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Austral RHN is 17 mm shorter, 75 mm wider and 25 mm lower than the Outlander CU. Its wheelbase is 42 mm longer.
Will the Renault Austral RHN and the Mitsubishi Outlander CU fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Renault Austral RHN fits, but it is tight to get out (967 mm to spare in length, 588 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander CU fits with room to open the doors (950 mm to spare in length, 625 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Austral RHN: 527 L against 402 L in the Mitsubishi Outlander CU (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.