Garage
ENES
Car finder

Size comparison · drawn to scale

Mitsubishi Outlander CU vs Renault Austral RHN: size comparison

  • Length Outlander CU 17 mm0.7 in longer
  • Width Austral RHN 75 mm3 in wider
  • Height Outlander CU 25 mm1 in taller
  • Boot Austral RHN 125 L4.4 cu ft more

Car 1 blue, solid outline

Outlander CU Mitsubishi · 2001–2006 · SUV Outlander CU 4,550 × 1,750 × 1,670 mm14 ft 11 in × 5 ft 9 in × 5 ft 6 in Change

Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Austral RHN Renault · 2022–present · SUV Austral RHN 4,533 × 1,825 × 1,645 mm14 ft 10 in × 6 ft 0 in × 5 ft 5 in Change
Change cars

Search any brand, model or year. Models we have no dimensions for yet are shown in grey.

  • Car 1, blue, solid outline: Outlander CU
  • Car 2, coral, dashed outline: Austral RHN
0 m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m1 m0 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ft6 ft7 ft8 ft9 ft10 ft11 ft12 ft13 ft14 ft15 ft16 ft17 ft18 ft19 ft20 ft21 ft1 ft2 ft3 ft4 ft5 ftWheelbase 2,625 mmWheelbase 8 ft 7 inLength 4,550 mmLength 14 ft 11 in1,670 mm5 ft 6 inWheelbase 2,667 mmWheelbase 8 ft 9 inLength 4,533 mmLength 14 ft 10 in1,645 mm5 ft 5 in

Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles

Dimensions and difference

The Outlander CU is 17 mm0.7 in longer, 75 mm3 in narrower and 25 mm1 in taller than the Austral RHN. Its wheelbase is 42 mm2 in shorter.

DimensionOutlander CUAustral RHNDifference, car 1 vs car 2
Length4,550 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,550 mm4,533 mm14 ft 10 in14 ft 10 in4,533 mm +17 mm+0.7 in +0.4%
Width1,750 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,750 mm1,825 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,825 mm −75 mm−3 in −4.1%
Height1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm1,645 mm5 ft 5 in5 ft 5 in1,645 mm +25 mm+1 in +1.5%
Wheelbase2,625 mm8 ft 7 in8 ft 7 in2,625 mm2,667 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,667 mm −42 mm−2 in −1.6%
Footprint7.96 m²85.7 sq ft85.7 sq ft7.96 m²8.27 m²89.0 sq ft89.0 sq ft8.27 m² −0.31 m²−3.3 sq ft −3.7%
Boot402 L14.2 cu ft14.2 cu ft402 L527 L18.6 cu ft18.6 cu ft527 L −125 L−4.4 cu ft −23.7%
Kerb weight1,515 kg3,340 lb3,340 lb1,515 kg1,685 kg3,715 lb3,715 lb1,685 kg −170 kg−375 lb −10.1%

Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.

Garage and parking

A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.

Outlander CU

Single garage
Fits 950 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 625 mm2 ft 1 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 450 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 375 mm1 ft 3 in each side

Austral RHN

Single garage
Tight 967 mm3 ft 2 in to spare in length, 588 mm1 ft 11 in each side
Parking bay
Tight 467 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 338 mm1 ft 1 in each side

Check your own garage with these cars

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander CU or the Renault Austral RHN?

The Renault Austral RHN is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander CU is 17 mm longer, 75 mm narrower and 25 mm taller than the Austral RHN. Its wheelbase is 42 mm shorter.

Will the Mitsubishi Outlander CU and the Renault Austral RHN fit in a standard garage?

In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander CU fits with room to open the doors (950 mm to spare in length, 625 mm each side). The Renault Austral RHN fits, but it is tight to get out (967 mm to spare in length, 588 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Renault Austral RHN: 527 L against 402 L in the Mitsubishi Outlander CU (seats up, as quoted by the maker).

Compare other cars

Report an error