Size comparison · drawn to scale
Mercedes-Benz GLK X204 vs Mitsubishi Outlander CU: size comparison
- Length Outlander CU 14 mm0.6 in longer
- Width GLK X204 90 mm4 in wider
- Height About the same height
- Boot GLK X204 48 L1.7 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles · wheelbase estimated where unknown Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The GLK X204 is 14 mm0.6 in shorter, 90 mm4 in wider and 1 mm0.0 in lower than the Outlander CU.
| Dimension | GLK X204 | Outlander CU | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,536 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,536 mm | 4,550 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,550 mm | −14 mm−0.6 in −0.3% |
| Width | 1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm | 1,750 mm5 ft 9 in5 ft 9 in1,750 mm | +90 mm+4 in +5.1% |
| Height | 1,669 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,669 mm | 1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm | −1 mm−0.0 in −0.1% |
| Wheelbase | Not in our catalog yet | 2,625 mm8 ft 7 in8 ft 7 in2,625 mm | - |
| Footprint | 8.35 m²89.8 sq ft89.8 sq ft8.35 m² | 7.96 m²85.7 sq ft85.7 sq ft7.96 m² | +0.38 m²+4.1 sq ft +4.8% |
| Boot | 450 L15.9 cu ft15.9 cu ft450 L | 402 L14.2 cu ft14.2 cu ft402 L | +48 L+1.7 cu ft +11.9% |
| Kerb weight | Not in our catalog yet | 1,515 kg3,340 lb3,340 lb1,515 kg | - |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
GLK X204
- Single garage
- Tight 964 mm3 ft 2 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 464 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Outlander CU
- Single garage
- Fits 950 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 625 mm2 ft 1 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 450 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 375 mm1 ft 3 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Mercedes-Benz GLK X204 or the Mitsubishi Outlander CU?
The Mercedes-Benz GLK X204 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The GLK X204 is 14 mm shorter, 90 mm wider and 1 mm lower than the Outlander CU.
Will the Mercedes-Benz GLK X204 and the Mitsubishi Outlander CU fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mercedes-Benz GLK X204 fits, but it is tight to get out (964 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). The Mitsubishi Outlander CU fits with room to open the doors (950 mm to spare in length, 625 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mercedes-Benz GLK X204: 450 L against 402 L in the Mitsubishi Outlander CU (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.