Size comparison · drawn to scale
Mitsubishi Outlander GF vs Mazda CX-5 KE: size comparison
- Length Outlander GF 100 mm4 in longer
- Width CX-5 KE 40 mm2 in wider
- Height Outlander GF 10 mm0.4 in taller
- Boot Outlander GF 88 L3.1 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline
Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Outlander GF is 100 mm4 in longer, 40 mm2 in narrower and 10 mm0.4 in taller than the CX-5 KE. Its wheelbase is 30 mm1 in shorter.
| Dimension | Outlander GF | CX-5 KE | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,655 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,655 mm | 4,555 mm14 ft 11 in14 ft 11 in4,555 mm | +100 mm+4 in +2.2% |
| Width | 1,800 mm5 ft 11 in5 ft 11 in1,800 mm | 1,840 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,840 mm | −40 mm−2 in −2.2% |
| Height | 1,680 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,680 mm | 1,670 mm5 ft 6 in5 ft 6 in1,670 mm | +10 mm+0.4 in +0.6% |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm8 ft 9 in8 ft 9 in2,670 mm | 2,700 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,700 mm | −30 mm−1 in −1.1% |
| Footprint | 8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² | 8.38 m²90.2 sq ft90.2 sq ft8.38 m² | Same |
| Boot | 591 L20.9 cu ft20.9 cu ft591 L | 503 L17.8 cu ft17.8 cu ft503 L | +88 L+3.1 cu ft +17.5% |
| Kerb weight | 1,495 kg3,296 lb3,296 lb1,495 kg | 1,390–1,550 kg3,064–3,417 lb3,064–3,417 lb1,390–1,550 kg | +105 kg+231 lb +7.6% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Outlander GF
- Single garage
- Fits 845 mm2 ft 9 in to spare in length, 600 mm2 ft 0 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 345 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 350 mm1 ft 2 in each side
CX-5 KE
- Single garage
- Tight 945 mm3 ft 1 in to spare in length, 580 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 445 mm1 ft 6 in to spare in length, 330 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Mitsubishi Outlander GF or the Mazda CX-5 KE?
The Mazda CX-5 KE is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Outlander GF is 100 mm longer, 40 mm narrower and 10 mm taller than the CX-5 KE. Its wheelbase is 30 mm shorter.
Will the Mitsubishi Outlander GF and the Mazda CX-5 KE fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Mitsubishi Outlander GF fits with room to open the doors (845 mm to spare in length, 600 mm each side). The Mazda CX-5 KE fits, but it is tight to get out (945 mm to spare in length, 580 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mitsubishi Outlander GF: 591 L against 503 L in the Mazda CX-5 KE (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.