Size comparison · drawn to scale
Kia Sportage SL vs Nissan X-Trail T32: size comparison
- Length X-Trail T32 200 mm8 in longer
- Width Sportage SL 35 mm1 in wider
- Height X-Trail T32 75 mm3 in taller
- Boot X-Trail T32 85 L3.0 cu ft more
Car 1 blue, solid outline
Car 2 coral, dashed outline

Change cars
Zoom in to read the measurements - or see the table below.
Scale about 1:22 on a desktop screen · grid 500 mm1 ft · in Overlay both cars start at the front bumper Side view: dashed lines mark the axles Front view: width without mirrors Top view: footprint on the road
Dimensions and difference
The Sportage SL is 200 mm8 in shorter, 35 mm1 in wider and 75 mm3 in lower than the X-Trail T32. Its wheelbase is 65 mm3 in shorter.
| Dimension | Sportage SL | X-Trail T32 | Difference, car 1 vs car 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,440 mm14 ft 7 in14 ft 7 in4,440 mm | 4,640 mm15 ft 3 in15 ft 3 in4,640 mm | −200 mm−8 in −4.3% |
| Width | 1,855 mm6 ft 1 in6 ft 1 in1,855 mm | 1,820 mm6 ft 0 in6 ft 0 in1,820 mm | +35 mm+1 in +1.9% |
| Height | 1,635 mm5 ft 4 in5 ft 4 in1,635 mm | 1,710 mm5 ft 7 in5 ft 7 in1,710 mm | −75 mm−3 in −4.4% |
| Wheelbase | 2,640 mm8 ft 8 in8 ft 8 in2,640 mm | 2,705 mm8 ft 10 in8 ft 10 in2,705 mm | −65 mm−3 in −2.4% |
| Footprint | 8.24 m²88.7 sq ft88.7 sq ft8.24 m² | 8.44 m²90.9 sq ft90.9 sq ft8.44 m² | −0.21 m²−2.2 sq ft −2.5% |
| Boot | 465 L16.4 cu ft16.4 cu ft465 L | 550 L19.4 cu ft19.4 cu ft550 L | −85 L−3.0 cu ft −15.5% |
| Kerb weight | 1,380–1,676 kg3,042–3,695 lb3,042–3,695 lb1,380–1,676 kg | 1,505–1,775 kg3,318–3,913 lb3,318–3,913 lb1,505–1,775 kg | −125 kg−276 lb −8.3% |
Width without mirrors. Figures come from the catalog version pages; the drawing uses the same numbers. Body outlines are generic for the body type - proportions are exact, styling is not. Weight difference compares the lightest versions.
Garage and parking
A typical single garage is about 5.5 × 3.0 m18 ft 1 in × 9 ft 10 in inside; a parking bay about 5.0 × 2.5 m16 ft 5 in × 8 ft 2 in. Room to open a door: about 600 mm2 ft each side.
Sportage SL
- Single garage
- Tight 1,060 mm3 ft 6 in to spare in length, 573 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 560 mm1 ft 10 in to spare in length, 323 mm1 ft 1 in each side
X-Trail T32
- Single garage
- Tight 860 mm2 ft 10 in to spare in length, 590 mm1 ft 11 in each side
- Parking bay
- Tight 360 mm1 ft 2 in to spare in length, 340 mm1 ft 1 in each side
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, the Kia Sportage SL or the Nissan X-Trail T32?
The Nissan X-Trail T32 is the bigger car by footprint (length × width). The Sportage SL is 200 mm shorter, 35 mm wider and 75 mm lower than the X-Trail T32. Its wheelbase is 65 mm shorter.
Will the Kia Sportage SL and the Nissan X-Trail T32 fit in a standard garage?
In a typical single garage of 5.5 × 3.0 m inside: The Kia Sportage SL fits, but it is tight to get out (1,060 mm to spare in length, 573 mm each side). The Nissan X-Trail T32 fits, but it is tight to get out (860 mm to spare in length, 590 mm each side). Widths are without mirrors; check your own garage with our garage checker.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Nissan X-Trail T32: 550 L against 465 L in the Kia Sportage SL (seats up, as quoted by the maker).
Drawn to one scale
Both cars use the same millimetre grid, so a longer bonnet or a taller roof shows exactly as it is.
Wheels at the real wheelbase
Dashed lines mark the axles. In Overlay both cars start at the front bumper; car 2 has a dashed outline.
Will it fit my garage?
Switch to Top view, or to feet and inches if your garage plan is in feet. Allow about 600 mm (2 ft) for opening the doors.
