Hyundai Santa Fe IV vs Chery Tiggo 8: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Hyundai · 2018–2023
Santa Fe IV
- Power
- 138 kW188 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,965 kg
Photo: Ethan Llamas / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Chery · 2018
Tiggo 8
- Power
- 108 kW147 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
In plain words
Hyundai Santa Fe IV has more power: 138 kW (188 PS) against 108 kW (147 PS) for Chery Tiggo 8. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Chery Tiggo 8 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Hyundai Santa Fe IV | Chery Tiggo 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.0 · diesel · 138 kW (188 PS) | 108 kW (147 PS) |
| Production years | 2018–2023 | 2018 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 138 kW (188 PS) 185 hp Better | 108 kW (147 PS) 145 hp |
| Power, all versions | 136–147 kW (185–200 PS) 182–197 hp | 90–187 kW (122–254 PS) 121–251 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft Better | 210 Nm 155 lb-ft |
| Power per tonne | 70 kW/t 85 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,000 cc 2.0 l | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,770 mm 187.8 in † | No data |
| Width | 1,890 mm 74.4 in † | No data |
| Height | 1,680 mm 66.1 in † | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,765 mm 108.9 in † | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,965 kg 4,332 lb | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 630 l 22.2 cu ft | No data |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 5.9 l/100 km 39.9 mpg US | No data |
| CO₂ | 191 g/km | No data |
| Fuel cost per year | €1,460/year estimated | No data |
| Safety | ||
| Euro NCAP | ★★★★★ (2018) | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (2): Body, Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.65/l diesel. † from another version of this generation.