Volkswagen Golf Mk1 vs Lada VAZ-2109: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 1974–1993
Golf Mk1
- Power
- 37 kW50 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 17.0 s
Photo: Sven Storbeck / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Lada · 1987–2004
VAZ-2109
- Power
- 47 kW64 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Photo: DL24 / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
- Family Golf Mk1 Boot: 320 l vs 270 l
In plain words
Lada VAZ-2109 has more power: 47 kW (64 PS) against 37 kW (50 PS) for Volkswagen Golf Mk1. Volkswagen Golf Mk1 has the bigger boot: 320 l against 270 l. Volkswagen Golf Mk1 is the older design (from 1974); Lada VAZ-2109 arrived in 1987. On the catalog figures, the Volkswagen Golf Mk1 is the pick for family. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Lada VAZ-2109 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| Golf Mk1 | VAZ-2109 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 320 l11.3 cu ft † | 270 l9.5 cu ft −50 l −1.8 cu ft −15.6% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs Golf Mk1 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors. † from another version of this generation.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Golf Mk1 | Lada VAZ-2109 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.1 · 37 kW (50 PS) | 1.3 · 47 kW (64 PS) |
| Production years | 1974–1993 | 1987–2004 |
| Body | Hatchback, Convertible | Hatchback |
| Country | Germany | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 37 kW (50 PS) 50 hp | 47 kW (64 PS) 63 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 37–81 kW (50–110 PS) 50–109 hp | 40–53 kW (54–72 PS) 54–71 hp |
| Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. | 77 Nm 57 lb-ft | No data |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 17.0 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,100 cc 1.1 l | 1,295 cc · 4 cyl 1.3 l |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 3,705 mm 145.9 in | No data |
| Width | 1,610 mm 63.4 in | No data |
| Height | 1,395 mm 54.9 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm 94.5 in | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 320 l 11.3 cu ft † Better | 270 l 9.5 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Drive.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.