Volkswagen Transporter T3 vs Ford Transit Mk1/Mk2: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Volkswagen · 1979–1992
Transporter T3
- Power
- 37 kW50 PS
- Kerb mass
- 1,395 kg
Photo: Rutger van der Maar / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

Ford · 1965–1986
Transit Mk1/Mk2
- Power
- 54 kW73 PS
- Kerb mass
- -
Photo: charles cars / Flickr, CC BY 2.0
In plain words
Ford Transit Mk1/Mk2 has more power: 54 kW (73 PS) against 37 kW (50 PS) for Volkswagen Transporter T3. Ford Transit Mk1/Mk2 is the older design (from 1965); Volkswagen Transporter T3 arrived in 1979. Our catalog has no kerb mass for the Ford Transit Mk1/Mk2 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Full specifications
| Volkswagen Transporter T3 | Ford Transit Mk1/Mk2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.6 CS · diesel · 37 kW (50 PS) | 1.7 · petrol · 54 kW (73 PS) |
| Production years | 1979–1992 | 1965–1986 |
| Body | Van, Minibus | Pickup, Van |
| Class | Van | Van |
| Country | Germany | United Kingdom |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 37 kW (50 PS) 50 hp | 54 kW (73 PS) 72 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 37–75 kW (50–102 PS) 50–101 hp | 32–63 kW (44–86 PS) 43–84 hp |
| Power per tonne | 27 kW/t 32 hp/ton calculated | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,588 cc 1.6 l | 1,700 cc 1.7 l |
| Engine code | CS | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,569 mm 179.9 in | No data |
| Height | 1,928 mm 75.9 in | No data |
| Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | No data | 80 l 21.1 gal US |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (1): Class.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).