KamAZ-5460 vs Volvo FH III: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
KamAZ · 2003–present
KamAZ-5460
- Power
- 294 kW400 PS
Photo: Alexey8601 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Volvo · 2012–present
FH III
No versions in our catalog yet
- Power
- 270–574 kW367–780 PS
Photo: Anthony Levrot / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
In plain words
KamAZ-5460 is the older design (from 2003); Volvo FH III arrived in 2012.
Full specifications
| KamAZ-5460 | Volvo FH III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 11.8 · diesel · 294 kW (400 PS) | No data |
| Production years | 2003–present | 2012–present |
| Body | Tractor unit | Tractor unit |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | No data | Sweden |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 294 kW (400 PS) 394 hp | 270–574 kW (367–780 PS) 362–770 hp Better |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine | 11,760 cc 11.8 l | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 6,340 mm 249.6 in † | No data |
| Width | 2,550 mm 100.4 in † | No data |
| Height | 3,130 mm 123.2 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 3,950 mm 155.5 in † | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 500 l 132.1 gal US † | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.