Toyota Supra A40/A50 vs Mazda RX-7 FB (SA22C): specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Toyota · 1978–1981
Supra A40/A50
- Power
- 81 kW110 PS
Photo: Sicnag / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0
Mazda · 1978–1985
RX-7 FB (SA22C)
- Power
- 85 kW116 PS
Photo: Thomas Vogt from Paderborn, Deutschland / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
In plain words
Mazda RX-7 FB (SA22C) has more power: 85 kW (116 PS) against 81 kW (110 PS) for Toyota Supra A40/A50.
Full specifications
| Toyota Supra A40/A50 | Mazda RX-7 FB (SA22C) | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 2.6 4M-E · 81 kW (110 PS) | 85 kW (116 PS) |
| Production years | 1978–1981 | 1978–1985 |
| Body | Liftback | Coupe |
| Class | Sports car | Sports car |
| Country | Japan | Japan |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 81 kW (110 PS) 109 hp | 85 kW (116 PS) 114 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 81–103 kW (110–140 PS) 109–138 hp | 75–121 kW (102–165 PS) 101–162 hp |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 2,600 cc · 6 cyl 2.6 l | No data |
| Engine code | 4M-E | No data |
| Drive | No data | Rear-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | No data | 160 l 5.7 cu ft |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).