ZIL-130 vs KamAZ-5320: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
ZIL · 1962–1994
ZIL-130
- Power
- 109 kW148 PS
- Top speed
- -
Photo: JopkeB / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
KamAZ · 1976–2000
KamAZ-5320
- Power
- 154 kW209 PS
- Top speed
- 50 km/h
Photo: Юрий Д.К. / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0
In plain words
KamAZ-5320 has more power: 154 kW (209 PS) against 109 kW (148 PS) for ZIL-130. ZIL-130 is the older design (from 1962); KamAZ-5320 arrived in 1976.
Full specifications
| ZIL-130 | KamAZ-5320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 109 kW (148 PS) | diesel · 154 kW (209 PS) |
| Production years | 1962–1994 | 1976–2000 |
| Body | Truck | Truck |
| Class | Heavy truck | Heavy truck |
| Country | Soviet Union (USSR) | Soviet Union (USSR) |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 109 kW (148 PS) 146 hp | 154 kW (209 PS) 207 hp Better |
| Power, all versions | 81–110 kW (110–150 PS) 109–148 hp | 132–154 kW (179–209 PS) 177–207 hp |
| Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. | No data | 50 km/h 31 mph |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | No data | Diesel |
| Engine | 8 cyl | No data |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | No data |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 6,675 mm 262.8 in † | No data |
| Width | 2,500 mm 98.4 in † | No data |
| Height | 2,400 mm 94.5 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 3,800 mm 149.6 in † | No data |
| Fuel tank Why it matters: A larger tank means more distance between fuel stops. | 170 l 44.9 gal US | No data |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (3): Body, Class, Country.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
† from another version of this generation.