Garage
ENES
Car finder

Comparisons

Daewoo Nexia vs Lada VAZ-2110: specs side by side

Report an error

Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.

Daewoo Nexia

Daewoo · 1994–2016

Nexia

C PI 466

Power
59 kW80 PS
0–100 km/h
12.5 s
Top speed
175 km/h
Kerb mass
969 kg

Version spec sheet

Photo: Throwawayacc222 / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
Lada VAZ-2110

Lada · 1995–2007

VAZ-2110

Power
52 kW71 PS
0–100 km/h
-
Top speed
-
Kerb mass
-

Photo: Dmitry Terekhov / Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0
Add a third car

At a glance

Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.

Categories won: Nexia 1 VAZ-2110 1

  • Family Nexia Boot: 530 l vs 416 l
  • City VAZ-2110 Length: 4,265 mm vs 4,482 mm
  • Off-road Too close to call Drive and body: Front-wheel drive · Sedan vs Front-wheel drive · Sedan

In plain words

Daewoo Nexia has more power: 59 kW (80 PS) against 52 kW (71 PS) for Lada VAZ-2110. Daewoo Nexia is 217 mm longer than Lada VAZ-2110 (4,482 mm vs 4,265 mm). Daewoo Nexia has the bigger boot: 530 l against 416 l. Daewoo Nexia is the older design (from 1994); Lada VAZ-2110 arrived in 1995. On the catalog figures, the Daewoo Nexia is the pick for family; the Lada VAZ-2110 is the pick for city. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Lada VAZ-2110 yet, so some checks above leave it out.

Size and weight

NexiaVAZ-2110
Length 4,482 mm176.5 in 4,265 mm167.9 in −217 mm −8.5 in −4.8%
Boot 530 l18.7 cu ft 416 l14.7 cu ft −114 l −4.0 cu ft −21.5%
Fits a standard garage? YesNo data

Difference vs Nexia (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.

Full specifications

Daewoo NexiaLada VAZ-2110
General
Version 1.5 · petrol · 59 kW (80 PS) 1.5 · 52 kW (71 PS)
Production years 1994–2016 1995–2007
Body Sedan Sedan
Country Uzbekistan No data
Performance
Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. 59 kW (80 PS) 79 hp Better 52 kW (71 PS) 70 hp
Power, all versions 55–80 kW (75–109 PS) 74–107 hp 52–67 kW (71–91 PS) 70–90 hp
Torque Why it matters: Torque is the pulling force you feel when accelerating from low revs, towing or climbing hills. 123 Nm 91 lb-ft No data
0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. 12.5 s No data
Top speed Why it matters: Top speed hints at how relaxed the car is at motorway speeds, even if you never reach it. 175 km/h 109 mph No data
Power per tonne 61 kW/t 74 hp/ton calculated No data
Engine and transmission
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 1,500 cc 1.5 l 1,500 cc 1.5 l
Drive Front-wheel drive Front-wheel drive
Dimensions and weight
Length 4,482 mm 176.5 in 4,265 mm 167.9 in
Width 1,662 mm 65.4 in No data
Height 1,393 mm 54.8 in No data
Wheelbase 2,520 mm 99.2 in No data
Kerb weight Why it matters: A lighter car is usually more agile and uses less energy. 969 kg 2,136 lb No data
Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. 530 l 18.7 cu ft Better 416 l 14.7 cu ft
Economy and running costs
Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. No data 7.5 l/100 km 31.4 mpg US
Fuel cost per year No data €1,970/year estimated

Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).

Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.

Photo credits