Lifan X60 vs Geely Emgrand X7: specs side by side
Quick comparison from catalog data - no editorial review of this pair yet.
Lifan · 2011–2018
X60
- Power
- 98 kW133 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 11.2 s
Photo: order_242 from Chile / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
Geely · 2015
Emgrand X7
- Power
- 92 kW125 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- -
Photo: Retired electrician / Wikimedia Commons, CC0
At a glance
Who suits what, worked out from the catalog figures of the versions above.
Categories won: X60 0 Emgrand X7 2
- Family Emgrand X7 Boot: 580 l vs 405 l
- Running costs Too close to call Fuel per year: €2,150 vs €2,210 (estimated)
- Off-road Emgrand X7 Drive and body: All-wheel drive · SUV vs Front-wheel drive · SUV
In plain words
Lifan X60 has more power: 98 kW (133 PS) against 92 kW (125 PS) for Geely Emgrand X7. Geely Emgrand X7 has the bigger boot: 580 l against 405 l. At 15,000 km a year, fuel would cost about €2,150 (Lifan X60), €2,210 (Geely Emgrand X7) (estimated). Lifan X60 is the older design (from 2011); Geely Emgrand X7 arrived in 2015. On the catalog figures, the Geely Emgrand X7 is the pick for family and off-road. Our catalog has no 0–100 km/h for the Geely Emgrand X7 yet, so some checks above leave it out.
Size and weight
| X60 | Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Boot | 405 l14.3 cu ft | 580 l20.5 cu ft +175 l +6.2 cu ft +43.2% |
| Fits a standard garage? | Yes | No data |
Difference vs X60 (±). Garage check: a standard single garage takes a car up to about 5.0 m (16 ft 5 in) long and 1.9 m (6 ft 3 in) wide (width as listed in the catalog; some makers include the mirrors). Leave about 0.6 m (2 ft) to open the doors.
Full specifications
| Lifan X60 | Geely Emgrand X7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Version | 1.8 · petrol · 98 kW (133 PS) | petrol · 92 kW (125 PS) |
| Production years | 2011–2018 | 2015 |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Class | SUV / crossover | SUV / crossover |
| Country | China | China |
| Performance | ||
| Power Why it matters: More power means stronger acceleration and easier overtaking, especially with a full load. | 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp Better | 92 kW (125 PS) 123 hp |
| Power, all versions | 98 kW (133 PS) 131 hp | 92–110 kW (125–150 PS) 123–148 hp |
| 0–100 km/h Why it matters: A shorter 0–100 km/h time means quicker getaways and safer merging onto fast roads. | 11.2 s | No data |
| Engine and transmission | ||
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Engine | 1,800 cc 1.8 l | No data |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
| Dimensions and weight | ||
| Length | 4,325 mm 170.3 in | No data |
| Width | 1,790 mm 70.5 in | No data |
| Height | 1,690 mm 66.5 in | No data |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm 102.4 in | No data |
| Boot Why it matters: A bigger boot fits more luggage, shopping or a pram. | 405 l 14.3 cu ft | 580 l 20.5 cu ft Better |
| Economy and running costs | ||
| Fuel consumption Why it matters: Lower consumption cuts running costs and CO₂ emissions on every trip. | 8.2 l/100 km 28.7 mpg US | 8.4 l/100 km 28.0 mpg US |
| Fuel cost per year | €2,150/year estimated | €2,210/year estimated |
These cars do not differ in the data we have.
Equal rows hidden (4): Body, Class, Country, Fuel.
Better marks the stronger figure - only for measurable specs (power, torque, 0–100 km/h, consumption, boot, weight).
Estimated at 15,000 km a year with fuel at €1.75/l petrol.